Has anyone seen the new wording on "legal guarding position" must have both feet IB

[Mark Padgett]

Originally posted by FBullock
I was in a rules meeting this weekend with Larry Boucher, the Chair of the Rules Committee. The new editorial change is, if they are on the line (OB), then they are not in a legal guarding position.

Then why don't they just say that? Jeez - when are they going to let the participants of this board edit the rule book?