The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Basketball

Reply
 
LinkBack (5) Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #61 (permalink)  
Old Sun Feb 23, 2014, 02:47pm
Rich's Avatar
Get away from me, Steve.
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 15,770
Quote:
Originally Posted by kylejt View Post
Yeah, if they request time, don't run at me, and keep it civil.

I just don't like the idea of someone yelling at me, be it on the diamond, hardcourt, or Costco, and not doing something about it.
I can't remember the last time a college baseball coach requested time before coming out and arguing a call I've made.

I could only imagine the reaction of my coordinator if I told him I ejected a coach because he didn't call time before he came out to argue a call. Or that he yelled. Goes with the territory.
Reply With Quote
  #62 (permalink)  
Old Sun Feb 23, 2014, 03:19pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: In the offseason.
Posts: 12,260
Quote:
Originally Posted by Toren View Post
So I have no problem with either call. Ideally I would have liked the Lead to have completed his rotation instead of moving during the action.
All nice but not really always possible. Players move when they chose to and we have to make the call when it occurs.
__________________
Owner/Developer of RefTown.com
Commissioner, Portland Basketball Officials Association
Reply With Quote
  #63 (permalink)  
Old Sun Feb 23, 2014, 03:25pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 460
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rich View Post
Do you change how you make a call based on a single call 10 minutes earlier? Personally, I think this would be a horrible way to officiate. I take every game one play at a time and I can't imagine guys at the top of the profession doing anything different.

2 wrongs wouldn't make a right.

(3 rights, however, make a left.)
At the beginning of my season, my conference supervisor and a regional observer watched my game. After the game, they came into the locker room and told the crew:

"To succeed at the higher levels of college basketball, you have to understand the feel and dynamics of the game. Calls and non-calls at one end of the floor deserve the similar calls and non-calls at the other end of the floor when the plays are similar."

When the boss and an observer tell you this, then you do as they say.
Reply With Quote
  #64 (permalink)  
Old Sun Feb 23, 2014, 03:37pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: In the offseason.
Posts: 12,260
Quote:
Originally Posted by dahoopref View Post
At the beginning of my season, my conference supervisor and a regional observer watched my game. After the game, they came into the locker room and told the crew:

"To succeed at the higher levels of college basketball, you have to understand the feel and dynamics of the game. Calls and non-calls at one end of the floor deserve the similar calls and non-calls at the other end of the floor when the plays are similar."

When the boss and an observer tell you this, then you do as they say.
What is implied in that statement is the word "correct" calls and "correct" non-calls with "correct" being subjective in some cases. If you totally kick one at one end, that philosophy is not saying you should kick it at the other.
__________________
Owner/Developer of RefTown.com
Commissioner, Portland Basketball Officials Association
Reply With Quote
  #65 (permalink)  
Old Sun Feb 23, 2014, 03:42pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: In the offseason.
Posts: 12,260
Quote:
Originally Posted by 7IronRef View Post
End of game B/C - Block, defender had no established LGP prior to the upward motion of the shooter. The L makes this call in rotation, the T was backing out.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Adam View Post
I see LGP before he even holds the ball, let alone starting his upward motion. It's a bit grainy for me, though, to know for sure, so I'll defer to the guy standing 5 feet away.

Agree with Adam here. The defender obtained initial LGP before the dribble even ended....well before upward motion. That is what the new rule/POE requires. It makes no restriction on moving to maintain an already established LGP. If the defender continues to move AND remain in the opponents path the entire time, then they are legal. They've already met the requirement for upward motion.

If the opponent jumps in a direction not toward the defender, the defender is no longer in the path and it is too late to obtain a new position in the path.
__________________
Owner/Developer of RefTown.com
Commissioner, Portland Basketball Officials Association
Reply With Quote
  #66 (permalink)  
Old Sun Feb 23, 2014, 03:44pm
We don't rent pigs
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 7,627
Quote:
Originally Posted by dahoopref View Post
Calls and non-calls at one end of the floor deserve the similar calls and non-calls at the other end of the floor when the plays are similar."

This logic is flawed, no matter who said it. Two plays can be very similar and still be on opposite sides of a line.
__________________
I swear, Gus, you'd argue with a possum.
It'd be easier than arguing with you, Woodrow.


Lonesome Dove
Reply With Quote
  #67 (permalink)  
Old Sun Feb 23, 2014, 03:49pm
Esteemed Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 22,934
And No Crying Either ...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rich View Post
Different sports, Kyle. Different expectations. Doesn't make basketball wrong and baseball right, either. Boeheim JUST BEING ON THE FLOOR arguing is a pretty automatic technical foul. Baseball allows managers to come onto the field and argue without ejecting quite a few of them.
I know more about quantum physics than I do about baseball rules, but: No technical fouls in baseball, just ejections, no other options.
__________________
"For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life." (John 3:16)

“I was in prison and you came to visit me.” (Matthew 25:36)

Last edited by BillyMac; Sun Feb 23, 2014 at 03:57pm.
Reply With Quote
  #68 (permalink)  
Old Sun Feb 23, 2014, 05:31pm
9/11 - Never Forget
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 5,642
Send a message via Yahoo to grunewar
This ESPN article also has some great isolation video of Boeheim's reaction from several different angles.....

Referees made right call at end of Syracuse Orange-Duke Blue Devils game, official says - ESPN

From the article: "The timing of this particular call, with the NCAA tournament right around the corner, will only add to the heightened scrutiny officials are facing."

(Someone can isolate the video - I gotta learn how to do that!)
__________________
There was the person who sent ten puns to friends, with the hope that at least one of the puns would make them laugh. No pun in ten did.

Last edited by grunewar; Sun Feb 23, 2014 at 05:36pm.
Reply With Quote
  #69 (permalink)  
Old Sun Feb 23, 2014, 06:20pm
sj sj is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 360
Quote:
Originally Posted by grunewar View Post
This ESPN article also has some great isolation video of Boeheim's reaction from several different angles.....

Referees made right call at end of Syracuse Orange-Duke Blue Devils game, official says - ESPN

From the article: "The timing of this particular call, with the NCAA tournament right around the corner, will only add to the heightened scrutiny officials are facing."

(Someone can isolate the video - I gotta learn how to do that!)
I'm not a college official so need to understand how this is different from the year before.

According to the article they added, "A defensive player is not permitted to move into the path of an offensive player once he has started his upward motion with the ball to attempt a field goal or pass. If the defensive player is not in legal guarding position by this time, it is a blocking foul."

Based on my limited understanding of what the college guys have been told about it how is this different than what they might have called the year before. Thanks.
Reply With Quote
  #70 (permalink)  
Old Sun Feb 23, 2014, 07:19pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 460
Quote:
Originally Posted by sj View Post
I'm not a college official so need to understand how this is different from the year before.

According to the article they added, "A defensive player is not permitted to move into the path of an offensive player once he has started his upward motion with the ball to attempt a field goal or pass. If the defensive player is not in legal guarding position by this time, it is a blocking foul."

Based on my limited understanding of what the college guys have been told about it how is this different than what they might have called the year before. Thanks.
From the 2011-12 Rulebook:

Quote:
Section 35. Guarding

Art. 4. To establish an initial legal guarding position on the player with the ball:

d. When the opponent with the ball is airborne, the guard shall have attained
legal guarding position before the opponent left the playing court.
(Exception: Rule 4-35.7)
From the 2014-15 Rulebook:

Quote:
Section 17. Guarding

Art. 4. To establish an initial legal guarding position on the player with the ball:

d. When the opponent with the ball is airborne, the guard shall have attained
legal guarding position before the opponent begins his upward motion
with his hands/arms to shoot or pass
. (Exception: Rule 4-17.7)
Reply With Quote
  #71 (permalink)  
Old Sun Feb 23, 2014, 07:28pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 460
Quote:
Originally Posted by just another ref View Post
This logic is flawed, no matter who said it. Two plays can be very similar and still be on opposite sides of a line.
When someone has a position to integrate a philosophy throughout the officiating landscape to bring continuity for all regions, I believe it is upon us to work on implementing this way of thinking.

If we as officials are closed minded to a different way of thinking, there can never be a continuity in officiating across the country; which perpetuates the stereotype that the ACC, Big 12, Big 10, Pac 12, SEC officiate differently. This is something that John Adams is trying his best to eliminate.
Reply With Quote
  #72 (permalink)  
Old Sun Feb 23, 2014, 07:32pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 14,995
Quote:
Originally Posted by sj View Post
I'm not a college official so need to understand how this is different from the year before.

According to the article they added, "A defensive player is not permitted to move into the path of an offensive player once he has started his upward motion with the ball to attempt a field goal or pass. If the defensive player is not in legal guarding position by this time, it is a blocking foul."

Based on my limited understanding of what the college guys have been told about it how is this different than what they might have called the year before. Thanks.
In prior years the defender had until the offensive player became airborne (both feet having left the floor) to obtain a legal guarding position. The new rule shifts that point to when the offensive player begins his upward movement with his hands and arms. So in NCAA men's games defenders need to get there earlier this year.
Reply With Quote
  #73 (permalink)  
Old Sun Feb 23, 2014, 07:49pm
AremRed
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nevadaref View Post
So in NCAA men's games defenders need to get there establish legal guarding position earlier this year.
ftfy
Reply With Quote
  #74 (permalink)  
Old Sun Feb 23, 2014, 07:52pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 168
Quote:
Originally Posted by kylejt View Post
Yeah, if they request time, don't run at me, and keep it civil.

I just don't like the idea of someone yelling at me, be it on the diamond, hardcourt, or Costco, and not doing something about it.
Is this a rule in a league, local area, association or state you ump at? Or is this how you apply it individually? I understand about keeping it civil but I'm not aware of any protocall where a manager must request time before entering the field to contest a call.
Reply With Quote
  #75 (permalink)  
Old Sun Feb 23, 2014, 07:58pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: In the offseason.
Posts: 12,260
Quote:
Originally Posted by dahoopref View Post
When someone has a position to integrate a philosophy throughout the officiating landscape to bring continuity for all regions, I believe it is upon us to work on implementing this way of thinking.

If we as officials are closed minded to a different way of thinking, there can never be a continuity in officiating across the country; which perpetuates the stereotype that the ACC, Big 12, Big 10, Pac 12, SEC officiate differently. This is something that John Adams is trying his best to eliminate.
To properly implement the philosophy requires understanding the philosophy in the first place. It is not about being closed minded. It is simply about understanding what that philosophy really means. It has nothing to do with deliberately calling a foul wrong because one a few minutes before was called incorrectly.

And even if it isn't about one being wrong vs. right, there has to be a line somewhere and at some point, one play will have gone just a little bit too far.
__________________
Owner/Developer of RefTown.com
Commissioner, Portland Basketball Officials Association
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


LinkBacks (?)
LinkBack to this Thread: https://forum.officiating.com/basketball/97351-video-request-syracuse-vs-duke-video.html
Posted By For Type Date
Is it time to crack down on college bball coaches riding refs? This thread Refback Mon Feb 24, 2014 05:28pm
FARK.com: (8153620) It was a rough night for Syracuse coach Jim Boeheim. First he was ejected and his team lost to Duke. Then he was chased by the Stay Puft Marshmallow Man and attacked by sharks This thread Refback Sun Feb 23, 2014 06:15pm
LongStories_net comments on Duke defeats Syracuse 66-60 in Cameron. This thread Refback Sun Feb 23, 2014 01:03pm
Duke - Syracuse: intense... | Syracusefan.com This thread Refback Sun Feb 23, 2014 10:24am
Officiating discussion This thread Refback Sun Feb 23, 2014 05:49am

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Duke/Syracuse (Video Added) MathReferee Basketball 7 Mon Feb 03, 2014 02:08am
Syracuse/UM Carter-Williams video request Raymond Basketball 6 Mon Apr 08, 2013 04:13pm
Duke - Louisville Video request Adam Basketball 52 Mon Apr 01, 2013 05:36am
Video Request Kelly from Duke just another ref Basketball 0 Fri Mar 29, 2013 10:36pm
Video Request: Syracuse v. Indiana JRutledge Basketball 23 Fri Mar 29, 2013 09:51am


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:54am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1