Pass that goes in.

[SNIPERBBB]

Originally Posted by Welpe

I get what you guys are saying and it makes sense to me logically but it definitely doesn't jive with the rule (not the first time for sure). I'll look for that Case Play that Camron references. If one of you comes across it, please post it here.

The case play is 4.41.4 Situation B.

A1's three-point try is short and bleow ring level when it hits the shoulder of: (a)A2; or (b)B1 and rebounds to the backboard and through the basket. Ruling: the three-point try ended when it was obviously short and below the ring. However, since a live ball went through the basket, two points are scored in both (a) and (b). (5-1)

[Scratch85]

Originally Posted by SNIPERBBB

The case play is 4-41-4 Situation B.

Now I am conflicted! I hate when this happens.

This case play showed up somewhere between 03-04 and 07-08. 5.2.1C was in the books in 2003. This leads me to believe the Fed wanted to make a point as described by Snaqs/Camron and anyone else who supported that thought. Why else would they add it after 5.2.1C already existed?

Similar to what my "chops bustin'" friend has been known to say, I guess ol' Scratch is full of shiz nit. I am re-thinking this one!

[BktBallRef]

Originally Posted by SNIPERBBB

The case play is 4-41-4 Situation B.

The case play is 4.41.4 Situation B.

Rules = dashes, case plays = dots.

[SNIPERBBB]

Yeah, caught that right after I posted, edited shortly after <_<