Difference in ruling on same casebook play?

[ronny mulkey]

Originally Posted by bob jenkins

I don't have the books handy, but I'm 93.5% certain that:

1) D is a new case

2) It was discussed here when it was first issued (said so you can search to get more information)

3) Most of us here disagree with the ruling (it's as if the rule was changed from "POI" to "do-over.")

Bob and MTD,

So, you kinda agree that the plays should be treated the same? Which case has the correct ruling (in y'alls' opinion?)

Mulk

[HoopsRefJunior]

Do over? Mulk would never allow a do-over in one of his games!

[bob jenkins]

Originally Posted by ronny mulkey

Bob and MTD,

So, you kinda agree that the plays should be treated the same? Which case has the correct ruling (in y'alls' opinion?)

Mulk

Under the current rules, I think G is the correct ruling. (said without looking at my books, and just based on the recollection of our previous discussions)

[Scrapper1]

Here is the thread where we talked about this very thing:

Unmerited free throw

As I said in that thread, I think Mary Struckoff considers the POI to actually the Point of the Error, which is a mistake IMHO.

I would not be at all surprised if this ruling were "fixed" this summer.

[Adam]

Originally Posted by Scrapper1

Here is the thread where we talked about this very thing:

Unmerited free throw

As I said in that thread, I think Mary Struckoff considers the POI to actually the Point of the Error, which is a mistake IMHO.

I would not be at all surprised if this ruling were "fixed" this summer.

Can they fix the stupid backcourt ruling while they're at it?

[Mark T. DeNucci, Sr.]

Originally Posted by Scrapper1

Here is the thread where we talked about this very thing:

Unmerited free throw

As I said in that thread, I think Mary Struckoff considers the POI to actually the Point of the Error, which is a mistake IMHO.

I would not be at all surprised if this ruling were "fixed" this summer.

Do you know what is scarey? I was thinking like Mary Struckhoff. LOL

I had to go back and re-read the original thread. I have to agree with you.

MTD, Sr.

[BillyMac]

Originally Posted by Mark T. DeNucci, Sr.

I was thinking like Mary Struckhoff.

Still dreaming about your former high school sweetheart?

[Mark T. DeNucci, Sr.]

Originally Posted by BillyMac

Still dreaming about your former high school sweetheart?

You need to ask WeaselPants for some of his meds.

MTD, Sr.

[BillyMac]

Originally Posted by Mark T. DeNucci, Sr.

I was thinking like Mary Struckhoff.

As in "like like"?

[Texas Aggie]

I don't think the casebook play for G is correct (for the D subsection). The rule says "rectify the error," and if you give the ball to B for a throw in, you aren't rectifying it. Besides, it doesn't make any sense. How is it "correcting" an error when you are depriving team A of their rightful penalty enforcement?

[Adam]

Originally Posted by Texas Aggie

I don't think the casebook play for G is correct (for the D subsection). The rule says "rectify the error," and if you give the ball to B for a throw in, you aren't rectifying it. Besides, it doesn't make any sense. How is it "correcting" an error when you are depriving team A of their rightful penalty enforcement?

The CE rules are not meant to be "fair," per se. Bob Jenkins says it better, but they're essentially designed to give both teams an incentive to try to prevent them as well.

A coach allowing a CE to continue in the hopes of benefiting is, essentially, eating a box of chocolates. He doesn't know what he's going to get.