![]() |
|
|
|||
Quote:
After the free throws, the only difference in college is that the ball could be put in play at the division line on either side of the table. Most college officials go opposite, anyway, even though they have a choice. Correct me if I'm wrong, but had this been a routine POI technical, the POI would have been the AP throw-in? |
|
|||
Quote:
By the way, there is no such thing as a "routine" technical foul in the rules book. What do you mean by that? It could mean different things to different people. Last edited by Nevadaref; Sun Feb 15, 2015 at 03:16am. |
|
|||
Quote:
Then we move to NCAAM 10-3-1e + 10-3-1 PENALTY & 10-3-1 RESUMPTION OF PLAY. This is a Class A unsporting tech that qualifies as a Flagrant 2 Contact Tech. Tell me again how my rules knowledge is a little off? Seems like it was pretty spot on. Lastly, the word "routine" is located nowhere in any basketball rule book. I'm pretty sure most people can figure that out. Are adjectives not authorized in this forum? I didn't get that memo. NOTE: I didn't look up the NCAAW verbiage, and I know it's a little different, but the end result would be the same. Last edited by crosscountry55; Sun Feb 15, 2015 at 09:32am. |
|
|||
Quote:
|
|
|||
Nope, a dead ball tech in NCAA men is not POI, so please refrain from confusing the situation with talk of POI.
|
|
|||
Quote:
|
|
|||
So would that then be an unsporting technical? If so, what difference does it make if the ball was live or dead?
|
|
|||
Quote:
Quote:
Cross country, am I correct in saying that your original question about a routine POI technical wasn't concerned with how the tech happened, but rather whether or not to go to the arrow after? That's what I would assume most reasonable people would gather from the phrase "routine POI technical." The point is the majority of technical fouls in fact ARE infractions that are resumed POI, and if a held ball was the last thing to happen before the technical foul, then we go to the arrow. |
|
|||
Quote:
Funny how I added an unnecessary word, and Nevada forgot a very important one, and between the two of us my simple question took about eight rounds of posting to resolve. All because of two words. |
|
|||
Quote:
His "routine" technical description was woefully unclear as shoving an opponent during a dead ball may be considered a "routine" technical by many officials. Others may feel the same way about a player expressing displeasure with a call. |
|
|||
"Contact" dead ball technicals are not POI in NCAAM. That word is important. Mouthing off during a dead ball is a class A and still POI. Dunking a dead ball is a Class B and still POI. Adding a player to the roster at the 6 minute mark..before the game..while the ball is dead is an administrative tech--POI.
|
![]() |
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
St. Johns v. Villanova: Dead Ball Contact Technical Foul | APG | Basketball | 14 | Mon Jan 07, 2013 12:13pm |
Live ball dead ball question | kzooref | Basketball | 23 | Thu Dec 02, 2010 09:28pm |
Dead ball technical | Boone12 | Basketball | 8 | Wed Mar 10, 2010 10:29pm |
Dead ball foul - diff. between intentional and technical | djskinn | Basketball | 32 | Sat Dec 30, 2006 08:07am |
Dead Ball Technical | IREFU2 | Basketball | 11 | Fri Feb 25, 2005 10:58pm |