The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Basketball

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Sat Feb 14, 2015, 11:15pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 1,742
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rob1968 View Post
As stated by fellow posters, the penalty for the DBT is 2 shots, and the throw-in for the offended team. Thus, the AP arrow is not affected
Might be worth noting that this ruling is nearly the same for both NFHS (Flagrant Tech) and NCAA (Flagrant 2 Tech) because the POI is not used for a Flagrant 2 Tech.

After the free throws, the only difference in college is that the ball could be put in play at the division line on either side of the table. Most college officials go opposite, anyway, even though they have a choice.

Correct me if I'm wrong, but had this been a routine POI technical, the POI would have been the AP throw-in?
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Sun Feb 15, 2015, 12:43am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 15,015
Quote:
Originally Posted by crosscountry55 View Post
Might be worth noting that this ruling is nearly the same for both NFHS (Flagrant Tech) and NCAA (Flagrant 2 Tech) because the POI is not used for a Flagrant 2 Tech.

After the free throws, the only difference in college is that the ball could be put in play at the division line on either side of the table. Most college officials go opposite, anyway, even though they have a choice.

Correct me if I'm wrong, but had this been a routine POI technical, the POI would have been the AP throw-in?
Your NCAA rules knowledge is a little off. Go do some research an post again once you've read the section on technical fouls and flagrant personal fouls.

By the way, there is no such thing as a "routine" technical foul in the rules book. What do you mean by that? It could mean different things to different people.

Last edited by Nevadaref; Sun Feb 15, 2015 at 03:16am.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Sun Feb 15, 2015, 09:29am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 1,742
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nevadaref View Post
Your NCAA rules knowledge is a little off. Go do some research an post again once you've read the section on technical fouls and flagrant personal fouls.

By the way, there is no such thing as a "routine" technical foul in the rules book. What do you mean by that? It could mean different things to different people.
NCAAM 4-15.3d(1) Flagrant 2 Contact Technical. If I was off by one word, I'll accept that [very egotistical] correction. By the way, why would I have any reason to look up the section on flagrant personal fouls in this instance? This was clearly a dead ball foul after the held ball.

Then we move to NCAAM 10-3-1e + 10-3-1 PENALTY & 10-3-1 RESUMPTION OF PLAY. This is a Class A unsporting tech that qualifies as a Flagrant 2 Contact Tech. Tell me again how my rules knowledge is a little off? Seems like it was pretty spot on.

Lastly, the word "routine" is located nowhere in any basketball rule book. I'm pretty sure most people can figure that out. Are adjectives not authorized in this forum? I didn't get that memo.

NOTE: I didn't look up the NCAAW verbiage, and I know it's a little different, but the end result would be the same.

Last edited by crosscountry55; Sun Feb 15, 2015 at 09:32am.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Sun Feb 15, 2015, 11:31am
Adam's Avatar
Keeper of the HAMMER
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: MST
Posts: 27,190
Quote:
Originally Posted by crosscountry55 View Post
Lastly, the word "routine" is located nowhere in any basketball rule book. I'm pretty sure most people can figure that out. Are adjectives not authorized in this forum? I didn't get that memo.
His point (a valid one) is that "routine" doesn't really tell us anything about what you were thinking on this, and does sort of leave us wondering what you meant. Can we guess? Sure, but it's a guess.
__________________
Sprinkles are for winners.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Sun Feb 15, 2015, 12:51am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Wyoming
Posts: 683
Quote:
Originally Posted by crosscountry55 View Post
Might be worth noting that this ruling is nearly the same for both NFHS (Flagrant Tech) and NCAA (Flagrant 2 Tech) because the POI is not used for a Flagrant 2 Tech.

After the free throws, the only difference in college is that the ball could be put in play at the division line on either side of the table. Most college officials go opposite, anyway, even though they have a choice.

Correct me if I'm wrong, but had this been a routine POI technical, the POI would have been the AP throw-in?
For NCAA, yes. The OP was high school, so there isn't a POI tech (unless multiple)
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Sun Feb 15, 2015, 09:32am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 15,015
Quote:
Originally Posted by frezer11 View Post
For NCAA, yes. The OP was high school, so there isn't a POI tech (unless multiple)
Nope, a dead ball tech in NCAA men is not POI, so please refrain from confusing the situation with talk of POI.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Sun Feb 15, 2015, 09:41am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 1,742
Quote:
Originally Posted by crosscountry55 View Post
Correct me if I'm wrong, but had this been a routine POI technical, the POI would have been the AP throw-in?
Quote:
Originally Posted by frezer11 View Post
For NCAA, yes.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nevadaref View Post
Nope, a dead ball tech in NCAA men is not POI, so please refrain from confusing the situation with talk of POI.
What if the dead ball tech is non-contact and not a flagrant 2? Would that not result in POI?
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Sun Feb 15, 2015, 10:05am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 15,015
Quote:
Originally Posted by crosscountry55 View Post
What if the dead ball tech is non-contact and not a flagrant 2? Would that not result in POI?
So would that then be an unsporting technical? If so, what difference does it make if the ball was live or dead?
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Sun Feb 15, 2015, 12:44pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Wyoming
Posts: 683
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nevadaref View Post
Nope, a dead ball tech in NCAA men is not POI, so please refrain from confusing the situation with talk of POI.
Umm... Yes it is. Before you go telling others to check the rules, you better be pretty sure yourself. The situation cc posted did NOT say dead ball contact. A "dead ball technical foul" written like that should be POI.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nevadaref View Post
So would that then be an unsporting technical? If so, what difference does it make if the ball was live or dead?
You're right about this, the ball being live or dead is irrelevant.

Cross country, am I correct in saying that your original question about a routine POI technical wasn't concerned with how the tech happened, but rather whether or not to go to the arrow after? That's what I would assume most reasonable people would gather from the phrase "routine POI technical." The point is the majority of technical fouls in fact ARE infractions that are resumed POI, and if a held ball was the last thing to happen before the technical foul, then we go to the arrow.
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old Sun Feb 15, 2015, 02:54pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 1,742
Quote:
Originally Posted by frezer11 View Post
Umm... Yes it is. Before you go telling others to check the rules, you better be pretty sure yourself. The situation cc posted did NOT say dead ball contact. A "dead ball technical foul" written like that should be POI.



You're right about this, the ball being live or dead is irrelevant.

Cross country, am I correct in saying that your original question about a routine POI technical wasn't concerned with how the tech happened, but rather whether or not to go to the arrow after? That's what I would assume most reasonable people would gather from the phrase "routine POI technical." The point is the majority of technical fouls in fact ARE infractions that are resumed POI, and if a held ball was the last thing to happen before the technical foul, then we go to the arrow.
Yes, it was.

Funny how I added an unnecessary word, and Nevada forgot a very important one, and between the two of us my simple question took about eight rounds of posting to resolve. All because of two words.
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old Mon Feb 16, 2015, 09:24am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 15,015
Quote:
Originally Posted by frezer11 View Post
Umm... Yes it is. Before you go telling others to check the rules, you better be pretty sure yourself. The situation cc posted did NOT say dead ball contact. A "dead ball technical foul" written like that should be POI.



You're right about this, the ball being live or dead is irrelevant.
You completely missed the point. Since you have just agreed that whether the ball is live or dead is irrelevant for an unsporting technical foul, the conclusion must be that the only tech for which it matters to specify that the ball was dead is the one involving contact. That was the point which I was trying to make to CC with my previous line of questioning as that kind of T also doesn't result in POI.

His "routine" technical description was woefully unclear as shoving an opponent during a dead ball may be considered a "routine" technical by many officials. Others may feel the same way about a player expressing displeasure with a call.
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old Sun Feb 15, 2015, 12:55pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Illinois
Posts: 1,804
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nevadaref View Post
Nope, a dead ball tech in NCAA men is not POI, so please refrain from confusing the situation with talk of POI.
"Contact" dead ball technicals are not POI in NCAAM. That word is important. Mouthing off during a dead ball is a class A and still POI. Dunking a dead ball is a Class B and still POI. Adding a player to the roster at the 6 minute mark..before the game..while the ball is dead is an administrative tech--POI.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
St. Johns v. Villanova: Dead Ball Contact Technical Foul APG Basketball 14 Mon Jan 07, 2013 12:13pm
Live ball dead ball question kzooref Basketball 23 Thu Dec 02, 2010 09:28pm
Dead ball technical Boone12 Basketball 8 Wed Mar 10, 2010 10:29pm
Dead ball foul - diff. between intentional and technical djskinn Basketball 32 Sat Dec 30, 2006 08:07am
Dead Ball Technical IREFU2 Basketball 11 Fri Feb 25, 2005 10:58pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:04am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1