![]() |
|
|||
Dead ball technical
MS game playing by NFHS rules...
A1 shoots and is fouled by B1, ball does not go through hoop, ends up in the hands of A1. While I am reporting A1 bats the ball into the back of B1's head. I call a technical on A1. This is very similar to the case book p84, 10.3.7. We clear the lane, A1 shoots two FT's, then team B player shoots two and gets the ball at the division line. Team A coach puts a sub in for A1. We play ball. I think I got a couple things wrong: 1. Ball should have been put in play at the spot nearest the foul (false double-foul). I thought I saw this in the book earlier, now I can't find it. 2. Another official told me that a dead-ball technical foul is automatically a flagrant foul. I can't find this in the book. I do see that 4.19.5c says that a technical foul can be intentional or flagrant while the ball is dead. This tells me that based on what I enforced I called an intentional technical foul. Thoughts on ball placement, flagrant vs intentional, other? Thanks, |
Bookmarks |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
"Dead Ball" Technical Foul | coach41 | Basketball | 10 | Fri Jan 01, 2010 03:39pm |
Live Ball Foul Called as Dead Ball | Reffing Rev. | Football | 15 | Wed Sep 09, 2009 01:30pm |
Dead ball foul - diff. between intentional and technical | djskinn | Basketball | 32 | Sat Dec 30, 2006 08:07am |
Dead Ball Technical | IREFU2 | Basketball | 11 | Fri Feb 25, 2005 10:58pm |
Legally putting ball in play, dead ball violations | BJ Moose | Baseball | 20 | Tue Aug 26, 2003 10:09am |