Questioning Partner's Call

[JRutledge]

Originally Posted by BillyMac

He makes it quite clear what he saw.



I think that it's got all the requirements of a backcourt violation. Two important things can get screwed up with this situation. Knowing the exception for the throwin, and knowing when player control takes place in the front court. He got them both right, using the proper "rule" language. Why discuss it further? Play on.

I am really not talking about just discussions of this specific play. If you were paying attention I said that if there was a real question that would be a conversation in the locker room either at halftime or after the game (maybe at the bar), but not on the floor. Partners I work with typically embrace speaking about plays and situations we dealt with in the game. And often asking about situations we did not see or did not have direct knowledge of as it was not in our primary or something a coach commented to us about. Almost never a big deal and almost never anyone gets upset by these discussions. Again, this is how we get better or know what actually happen.

Peace

[BillyMac]

Originally Posted by JRutledge

If you were paying attention I said that if there was a real question that would be a conversation in the locker room either at halftime or after the game ...

...

Originally Posted by BillyMac

... bring it up at halftime, or after the game ...