Stay out of my pond!

[just another ref]

Originally Posted by JRutledge

Once again, the Kansas player was coming from behind another moving player.

The MSU player did not try to stop the movement of the Kansas player.

These are totally irrelevant to the situation.

They both were going in the same direction......

This is not true.

...... and if anyone was responsible for falling, it was the Kansas player.

This is debatable.

[JRutledge]

Originally Posted by just another ref

These are totally irrelevant to the situation.

This is not true.


This is debatable.

Yes, it is debatable and that is the point.

Peace

[eyezen]

IMHO, the KU player tried to bring his right foot up and over the MSU player's leg and ended up tripping himself. I think I know why the lead thought he needed to come get it (absolute) but in this case IMHO he was wrong.

[just another ref]

Originally Posted by eyezen

IMHO, the KU player tried to bring his right foot up and over the MSU player's leg and ended up tripping himself. I think I know why the lead thought he needed to come get it (absolute) but in this case IMHO he was wrong.

I was waiting for somebody to suggest this. I don't think this is possible because the contact took place on the back foot of the player, considerably behind his field of vision. IOW, he was not trying to avoid the defender's foot, because he never saw it.