2 Team mates Foul 2 Opponents

[JugglingReferee]

Originally Posted by Jurassic Referee

R.I.F.

What part of "Ideally, the 2 officials will come to some kind of agreement that one foul actually did occur before the other one....which means that the second foul is ignored(unless intentional or flagrant). If the two officials can't decide between themselves whether one foul occurred before the other though, use the procedure outlined above." didn't you get?

So in other words, we're on the same page!

What does it matter if I post something an hour later than you do, and it leads to the same fact?

[mbyron]

Originally Posted by JugglingReferee

What does it matter if I post something an hour later than you do, and it eludes to the same fact?

Eluding the facts is a dangerous and undesirable practice.

[ma_ref]

I believe this scenario is covered under rule 11:

11-5-1: In situations where officials have simultaneous or near-simultaneous whistles involving fouls on the same team against different players, all officials huddle together closely. They shall pretend to talk to one another and occasionally nod their heads to make it appear as though they're having a meaningful discussion. Meanwhile, out of view from spectators and game personnel, 1 official secretly flips a coin to determine which foul really happened first. The official who wins the coin flip then reports their foul to the table, and the other official(s) return to their correct position on the playing court.

[Amesman]

Originally Posted by ma_ref

I believe this scenario is covered under rule 11:

11-5-1: In situations where officials have simultaneous or near-simultaneous whistles involving fouls on the same team against different players, all officials huddle together closely. They shall pretend to talk to one another and occasionally nod their heads to make it appear as though they're having a meaningful discussion. Meanwhile, out of view from spectators and game personnel, 1 official secretly flips a coin to determine which foul really happened first. The official who wins the coin flip then reports their foul to the table, and the other official(s) return to their correct position on the playing court.

Does the official whose call didn't count get to keep the coin?

[Mark T. DeNucci, Sr.]

Originally Posted by Amesman

Does the official whose call didn't count get to keep the coin?

Yes.

MTD, Sr.

[ma_ref]

Originally Posted by Amesman

Does the official whose call didn't count get to keep the coin?

Generally yes, but if the winning official puts in a claim for the coin, then another coin flip is performed to determine ownership of the coin. See rule 11-5-1(a)...