Quote:
Originally Posted by Nevadaref
I pointed out a couple of years ago on this forum that this situation is NOT covered by the current rules.
.......if the officials believe that the two fouls truly were simultaneous. ......... the officials must determine that one of the fouls happened before the other and only penalize that one. The other one gets ignored......
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nevadaref
You continue to misconstrue my post. I wrote that the officials must get together and decide which foul happened first, and then BY RULE (4-19-1 Note) the other one gets ignored. I did not advocate that the officials simply ignore one of the two fouls without reason, simply because they feel like it.
I am advocating following the rules. You are advocating ignoring the rules in the case of the blarge. It's really that simple.
|
You said that they truly believe the fouls were simultaneous. So you are suggesting they ignore the facts in order to follow the rules.
__________________
I swear, Gus, you'd argue with a possum.
It'd be easier than arguing with you, Woodrow.
Lonesome Dove
|