Quote:
Originally Posted by Nevadaref
For the most part, I agree with the dinosaur and also am thrilled to see him back posting on the forum again! 
However, the wording of the false multiple foul rule is problematic for a situation in which the two fouls occur simultaneously as one foul certainly wasn't committed following the other. |
No more problematic than simply ignoring one as you suggested. In reality, most officials would probably go with one call/signal, and ignore the other, but on the blarge thingie, y'all said I couldn't do that, so............