New Substitution Question

[Scrapper1]

Originally Posted by bob jenkins

It's just to be sure that the clock runs before A1 returns. You're being overly analytical and literal to try to track whether A6 was in the game when the clock ran.

I know. So why is the phrase in the article in the first place? Just say that the clock has to properly run before A1 can re-enter. Why bother to include language about the replacement?

The NFHS book says "after the clock has been started properly following his/her replacement". That says exactly what we want it to say (SURPRISE!!) and doesn't mention the person who replaced A1.

REPEAL NCAA 3-4-12!!

Nah, just fix the wording.