|
|
|||
Quote:
__________________
Any NCAA rules and interpretations in this post are relevant for men's games only! |
|
|||
Quote:
None of those rule changes seem "significant" to me...several of them are simply copying what the NCAA already does, and I thought the NFHS wanted to distinguish themselves from the NCAA... |
|
|||
some good some bad some ugly
I like the following:
1: 28 ft box..let them roam, and penalize them accordingly for unsporting behavior...I have always thought this was a good idea 7: make team control fouls available during a throw in, just seems logical to me 12: eliminating lag time, seems silly to me to have to allow a second in lag time, if there was definite knowledge...it could be important later 17: assessing one delay, simplifies things 19: coaches box stuff...again, if it is unsporting whack em, don't use the line on the floor to enforce it... 20: I would be in favor of the punch out for both I am also in favor of the sweatbands/headbands being worn correctly...it goes along with wearing the uniform correctly I am neutral on the following 2: gray shirts 4: odd/even....when I played our homes were even aways were odd 5: sweatbands/headbands same color as jersey 9: halves instead of quarters 13: held ball on throw in 14: terminating closely guarded....it seems we already do.. 15: shot clock 16: courtside replay I am absolutely against 3: 15 minute mark 6: eliminate closely guarded when dribbling 8: stopping clock in last minute, at the high school level and lower, we don't have good enough clock operators.. 10: extending the game 11: I still don't see the problem with the coach requesting a TO 18: allow pregame dunking??? are you kidding me.... allowing the uniform to be worn however a team sees fit....oh nooooooooo |
|
|||
Re #17.
I think the delay of game warnings should stay as is, one warning for each. Reason being, I think, especially for the lower levels, the warning is more of an educational tool. Example, a lot of the smaller kids, don't even realize they are breaking a rule, like "breaking the plane" etc. Just a thought.
__________________
I used to be indecisive, but now I'm not so sure. |
|
|||
Quote:
|
|
|||
Quote:
Mr. Chairman. I propose that Ms. Rehn of S.Dakota and Mr Barr of Iowa be publically censured and prohibited from making any further proposals. FYI: I would welcome 2, 7, 12, 15, 17, 20. |
|
|||
As an official who lives in Iowa and works for Mr. Barr, I can assure you we enforce the wristband rule as stated above. One would think there is more pressing issues to focus on, but how dare the players distract from the game and focus so much attention on themselves.
|
|
|||
Quote:
__________________
Never hit a piņata if you see hornets flying out of it. |
|
|||
Quote:
My point is there is no "wristband rule" in NF or any other code. And for an administrator to say I have to prostitute myself and enforce a rule that does not exist just because it is a pet peeve is full of himself and should be banned from involvement in any sport. Besides, NF says it is OK to have a cast over my upper arm and still be able to play by paddding it but heaven forbid anyone compromise the safety on another player by wearing those wristband/armbands/Iverson sleeve's. People who propose these kinds of rule changes are educated beyond their intelligence. Tell Mr. Barr to either keep his mouth shut or quit. Preferably the latter. And if you don't want to do it give him my contact information. |
|
|||
Quote:
Regarding SWEATBANDS and HEADBANDS: The National Federation Rule Book, on Page 26, Section 5, Article 3 states, "Equipment shall not be modified from its' original manufactured state and shall be worn in the manner the manufacturer intended it to be worn." (Sweatbands worn on the wrist, and headbands to be worn on the head.) One manufacturer's logo/trademark is permitted on the sweatbands or headbands. A headband no wider than 2", single-colored cloth may be worn. Rubber/cloth (elastic) bands may be used to control hair. How sweatbands are unnatural or designed to increase a player's height or reach to gain an advantage is beyond my three years of experience. Therefore I must enforce this as is, regardless of the logic (or lack thereof) behind it. It's hard to argue when the person writing the interpretations is also deciding the post-season assignments. By the way, the players are not required to double-knot their shoe laces yet. I think they can still wear velcro if they want too. |
|
|||
I was fortunate enough to be asked for an opinion on these by a member of the rules committee. He sent me the full list and asked me to vote on each. Not that my vote is final or anything like that, obviously, but he's taking the opinions of fellow officials into consideration before going to the meeting for the official vote. Here are the ones that I voted "YES" on.
Quote:
__________________
Any NCAA rules and interpretations in this post are relevant for men's games only! |
|
|||
#4 is too expensive, unless grandfathered. (Taking potshots at an unofficial list of submissions for proposals is easy and maybe pointless - but this won't be the last possibly pointless thing I do today. )
|
|
|||
I'd support:
1. 28 ft coaching box 7. include a foul committed during a throw-in by the throwing team as a team control foul 11. Only permitting players on the court to request a TO, head coach during a dead ball only 12. eliminate lag time if officials have definite knowledge of the time 19. coach is out of box and "just coaching" - first offense = warning, second offense = T; coach is out of box and behaving inappropriately - first offense = T (submitted by Mary Struckhoff) I'm neutral on: 2. permitting gray shirt for officials 5. require headbands/sweatbands to be same color as jersey 16. courtside replay for state championship games 20. Make signal #33 (current player control signal) also used for reporting a team control foul. I'd be against the rest. Is anyone summarizing these votes? |
|
|||
Quote:
2.gray shirts may be a nice change and put money in someone elses pocket too.. 6.this would make a fun end of the game if you have a good guard that could dribble, but if we go to shot clocks i would be all for no cg while dribbling 8.i think they should leave this in the college level...let the clock run 9.would love halves, coaches don't from what i hear around here in ky... 10. GAME IS LONG ENOUGH...LEAVE TIME ALONE 16 MINUTE HALVES IS GREAT 11. Would probably make it better so you don't have to look over your shoulder and take your eyes of the play, to make sure the coach is yelling time out...if the player don't ask, they don't get it...love it!! 14. pretty much do this anyways, does anyone call the CG when the defense is running behind the offense????? never seen it 15. would be pretty nice to see the shot clock, would make things even quicker than they are now 16. DEFINITELY needed...hate to see a team lose a game on a close call that could be changed and made right if they can look at the replay... 18. asking for trouble on this one.... no dunking should be allowed.. to many injuries possible, broken rims and backboards, etc.... 19. if they give them a 28ft box....if they get out of it, they should be blasted "t".....no warnings..
__________________
DETERMINATION ALL BUT ERASES THE THIN LINE BETWEEN THE IMPOSSIBLE AND THE POSSIBLE! |
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
2006 NF Rule Changes | rdfox | Football | 10 | Thu Mar 09, 2006 04:57pm |
2005 Rule revisions | kdf5 | Football | 22 | Tue Dec 14, 2004 06:04pm |
Proposed ASA Rule Changes | IRISHMAFIA | Softball | 8 | Mon Oct 11, 2004 07:09pm |
Proposed Rule Changes | IRISHMAFIA | Softball | 22 | Wed Oct 06, 2004 02:49pm |
2004 Proposed Rule Revisions | Nevadaref | Basketball | 18 | Thu Apr 22, 2004 07:37pm |