Interesting Play

[JRutledge]

Originally Posted by thedewed

this discussion is amusing from a logic perspective. I think the language needs to be clarified or it's a travel. here's why: what exactly would those with the opposite take consider an 'attempt' to stand from a prone position on the stomach that is different from this? attempt really has to mean a partial execution of the process of standing. in this case, how do you stand from laying down without first getting to your knees, particularly when holding a ball? and in this case, the evidence that she was in the process of standing is more conclusive since she, in fact, ended up standing in a fluid continuous manner.

so the question is, again, what would you consider to be an attempt to stand, if not this?

Is the situation specifically stated as a violation? Nope. So why would I say this is a vioation when clearly this as never stated as a violation? Again so you are giving a personal opinion and we need more than that. And most of all, this was asked by the people at the NF and they said it was not a violation. And said that the information in the casebook did not apply the the video shown. It cannot get more clearer than that unless you just want to only accept an unofficial opinion. Now this is not something official from the organization as a whole, but it is clear that the NF does not see this as illegal.

Peace