IL Test Question

[ilyazhito]

What I meant was that once an event occurs that establishes possession, the AP arrow is set. That means that the subsequent throw-in is not an AP throw-in, so the arrow won't be affected by the ball being thrown in (or not).

[bob jenkins]

Originally Posted by ilyazhito

What I meant was that once an event occurs that establishes possession, the AP arrow is set. That means that the subsequent throw-in is not an AP throw-in, so the arrow won't be affected by the ball being thrown in (or not).

Just as there are not FTs int he OP, there's also no "subsequent throw-in."

And, ... if there's a T or IP to start the game, that would "establish possession" yet the arrow would NOT be set until the subsequent throw-in begins.

[JRutledge]

Originally Posted by ilyazhito

What I meant was that once an event occurs that establishes possession, the AP arrow is set. That means that the subsequent throw-in is not an AP throw-in, so the arrow won't be affected by the ball being thrown in (or not).

You are way overthinking this. It is just a question on a test, do not add stuff to the question that was not asked.

Peace

[ilyazhito]

I had a similar question on my test, but my question referenced setting the arrow after technical fouls. That is why I referenced free throws.

[BillyMac]

Originally Posted by ilyazhito

I had a similar question on my test, but my question referenced setting the arrow after technical fouls. That is why I referenced free throws.

I, more than most, often "twist" situations to explore similar but slightly different situations, but I always point out that it's a "twist", and usually wait until the original situation has been, for the most part, answered. Failing to do that could lead to confusion.