FTs shot in wrong order - correctable

[bucky]

Sure we have discussed. Can't find it.

A1 is shooting and gets hit by B1. Foul is called and B1 slams ball. One official does not realize that A1 was shooting and administers the technical foul FTs. After the FT's, the officials discuss and decide indeed, A1 was shooting.

FT's were shot in wrong order. Is there a case play some place that indicates this falls under correctable errors? I do not think case play exists but want to confirm with the forum.

[SNIPERBBB]

Order of free throws isnt a CE.

[ilyazhito]

This is not a correctable error. Because the merited free throws were awarded to the correct players, they would count. The only correction involved would be clearing the lane for the out-of-order personal foul free throws, and awarding possession to Team A at the division line opposite the table per the technical foul rules.

[Camron Rust]

This was a correctable error....failure to award merited FTs to A1. After shooting the FTs for the T, you discussed it, realizing A1 was not given the merited FTs, and corrected the error by awarding A1 the FTs that were merited but not shot when they should have been.

If you had simply shot them out of order thinking that it was the right way to do it and realized later that the order was wrong, that wouldn't be a correctable error....case 8.6.2B.

So, the wrong order itself isn't a correctable error, but realizing A1 didn't get FTs that should have been given is a correctable error.

[BillyMac]

Originally Posted by Camron Rust

If you had simply shot them out of order thinking that it was the right way to do it and realized later that the order was wrong, that wouldn't be a correctable error....case 8.6.2B.

Nice citation Camron Rust.

8.6.2 SITUATION B: B1 fouls A1 just as the first quarter ends and then A1 retaliates and intentionally contacts B1. A1’s foul is a technical foul as it occurred during a dead ball. Team A is in the bonus. The officials by mistake administer the penalty for the technical foul before the free throw(s) by A1. RULING: The penalties should have been administered in the order in which the fouls occurred. However, since all merited free throws were attempted it does not constitute a correctable error situation. The second quarter will begin with an alternating-possession throw-in. (4-19-5c)

[WhistlesAndStripes]

Originally Posted by BillyMac

Nice citation Camron Rust.



8.6.2 SITUATION B: B1 fouls A1 just as the first quarter ends and then A1 retaliates and intentionally contacts B1. A1’s foul is a technical foul as it occurred during a dead ball. Team A is in the bonus. The officials by mistake administer the penalty for the technical foul before the free throw(s) by A1. RULING: The penalties should have been administered in the order in which the fouls occurred. However, since all merited free throws were attempted it does not constitute a correctable error situation. The second quarter will begin with an alternating-possession throw-in. (4-19-5c)

In the case play cited, if you shoot the FTs In the correct order(bonus and then technical), do you then administer the throw-in to start the second quarter based on the technical foul, or the AP arrow?

[bob jenkins]

Originally Posted by WhistlesAndStripes

In the case play cited, if you shoot the FTs In the correct order(bonus and then technical), do you then administer the throw-in to start the second quarter based on the technical foul, or the AP arrow?

Hint 1: Can part of a penalty carry over from one quarter to the next?

Hint 2; WTF difference does it make (for this question) in what order the FTs were shot?

[WhistlesAndStripes]

Originally Posted by bob jenkins

Hint 1: Can part of a penalty carry over from one quarter to the next?

Hint 2; WTF difference does it make (for this question) in what order the FTs were shot?

1. Yes
2. This gives away the answer that you use the arrow.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

[MattReferee]

Originally Posted by ilyazhito

this is not a correctable error. Because the merited free throws were awarded to the correct players, they would count. The only correction involved would be clearing the lane for the out-of-order personal foul free throws, and awarding possession to team a at the division line opposite the table per the technical foul rules.

👏🏀👍🏻

[BillyMac]

Originally Posted by bob jenkins

Can part of a penalty carry over from one quarter to the next?

5-6: Each quarter or extra period ends when the signal illuminates
or sounds indicating time has expired, as in 1-14.
EXCEPTIONS:
1. If the ball is in flight during a try or tap for field goal, the quarter or
extra period ends when the try or tap ends.
2. If a held ball or violation occurs so near the expiration of time that the
clock is not stopped before time expires, the quarter or extra period ends
with the held ball or violation.
3. If a foul occurs so near the expiration of time that the timer cannot get the
clock stopped before time expires or after time expires, but while the ball
is in flight during a try or tap for field goal, the quarter or extra period ends
when the free throw(s) and all related activity have been completed. No
penalty or part of a penalty carries over from one quarter or extra period to
the next, except when a correctable error, as in 2-10, is rectified.

[bob jenkins]

Originally Posted by WhistlesAndStripes

1. Yes
2. This gives away the answer that you use the arrow.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

1. Incorrect

2. Not any more than hint 1.

[WhistlesAndStripes]

Originally Posted by bob jenkins

1. Incorrect



2. Not any more than hint 1.

The final sentence of your case play, the “except when” portion indicates that my answer to #1 was actually correct.

Also, a player who is disqualified for a flagrant foul in the first quarter has that part of the penalty carryover to the remaining quarters of the game. Just sayin’...


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

[BillyMac]

Originally Posted by WhistlesAndStripes

... a player who is disqualified for a flagrant foul in the first quarter has that part of the penalty carryover to the remaining quarters of the game. Just sayin’...

... it is important to know the intent and purpose of a rule so that it
may be intelligently applied in each play situation.

[bob jenkins]

Originally Posted by WhistlesAndStripes

The final sentence of your case play, the “except when” portion indicates that my answer to #1 was actually correct.

Also, a player who is disqualified for a flagrant foul in the first quarter has that part of the penalty carryover to the remaining quarters of the game. Just sayin’...


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

We already indicated that this wasn't a CE (for the throw-in we are discussing).

[bucky]

Great input and thanks for pointing out the exact case, 8.6.2 Sit A. I searched the case book thoroughly but not in the areas regarding putting the ball in play.

Thanks again. Incorrect order of proper FTs is not CE.