![]() |
|
|||
Agreed. If the defender had to reach through the plane, it would be a technical. That's one of those rules that has never made sense to me. If you reach over and swipe at the ball, it is called an intentional foul, yet if you actually contact the ball, it is a worse penalty, a tech.
|
|
|||
Quote:
Difference in the adjudication is that live ball contact is a personal foul. Can't have a personal foul for contacting the ball.
__________________
A-hole formerly known as BNR |
|
|||
Holding the ball across the line does not make the ball inbounds....just clarifying, perhaps what you meant.
__________________
If some rules are never enforced, then why do they exist? ![]() |
|
|||
Quote:
Just how tall is A1 if s/he can hold the ball over the baseline? ![]() |
|
|||
If the contact takes place on the inbounds side of the boundary plane, it's legal; if the contact is on the out-of-bounds side of the plane, it's illegal.
|
|
|||
Quote:
I interpret this to mean that ALL of the ball must over the in-bounds area of the court, for it to be legally touched by a defender. |
|
|||
If the inbound puts the ball through the plane and its tied up by the inbounder defender...what happens Chuck?
__________________
BigT "The rookie" |
|
|||
Then it's a held ball, with Team A retaining the arrow.
|
|
|||
Quote:
The defender can't reach through the line, that's it. If they hit/touch the ball without doing so, it is legal.
__________________
Owner/Developer of RefTown.com Commissioner, Portland Basketball Officials Association |
|
|||
Quote:
I assume it's that last option. |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Inbounds | nero21 | Basketball | 23 | Mon Mar 07, 2011 07:43am |
Inbounds | boss21 | Basketball | 7 | Fri Jan 08, 2010 01:19pm |
Inbounds-Outofbounds-Inbounds??? | BoBo | Football | 3 | Fri Nov 04, 2005 11:28am |
inbounds | pwarburt | Basketball | 8 | Tue Jun 06, 2000 01:37pm |
inbounds | kent wilson | Basketball | 8 | Fri Apr 07, 2000 03:00pm |