![]() |
|
|
|||
Agreed. If the defender had to reach through the plane, it would be a technical. That's one of those rules that has never made sense to me. If you reach over and swipe at the ball, it is called an intentional foul, yet if you actually contact the ball, it is a worse penalty, a tech.
|
|
|||
Quote:
Difference in the adjudication is that live ball contact is a personal foul. Can't have a personal foul for contacting the ball.
__________________
A-hole formerly known as BNR |
|
|||
If the inbound puts the ball through the plane and its tied up by the inbounder defender...what happens Chuck?
__________________
BigT "The rookie" |
|
|||
Then it's a held ball, with Team A retaining the arrow.
|
|
|||
Holding the ball across the line does not make the ball inbounds....just clarifying, perhaps what you meant.
__________________
If some rules are never enforced, then why do they exist? ![]() |
|
|||
Quote:
Just how tall is A1 if s/he can hold the ball over the baseline? ![]() |
|
|||
Quote:
I assume it's that last option. |
|
|||
Quote:
I'm going with "when the loose ball is next touched" (which is mostly your last option) |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Inbounds | nero21 | Basketball | 23 | Mon Mar 07, 2011 07:43am |
Inbounds | boss21 | Basketball | 7 | Fri Jan 08, 2010 01:19pm |
Inbounds-Outofbounds-Inbounds??? | BoBo | Football | 3 | Fri Nov 04, 2005 11:28am |
inbounds | pwarburt | Basketball | 8 | Tue Jun 06, 2000 01:37pm |
inbounds | kent wilson | Basketball | 8 | Fri Apr 07, 2000 03:00pm |