Jerseys during Warm-ups

[bucky]

Originally Posted by frezer11

See Bob's Post #12 above, Situation 4.

I did and still do not see where it shows that. I read it as the warm up top comes off to reveal bare skin. I do not read that it requires the jersey be underneath. Just my opinion.

[Camron Rust]

Originally Posted by bucky

I did and still do not see where it shows that. I read it as the warm up top comes off to reveal bare skin. I do not read that it requires the jersey be underneath. Just my opinion.

I do not believe that it is the bare skin that matters. It is the doffing and/or donning of the jersey itself. Consider the case where a player gets blood on a jersey but has an undershirt on too. That player still has to exit the gym to change the jersey.

[BillyMac]

Originally Posted by Camron Rust

It is the doffing and/or donning of the jersey itself.

Maybe by interpretation, but not by rule. The rule only states that players can't remove the jersey and/or pants/skirt within the visual confines of the playing area.

[pfan1981]

Does anyone see this being addressed by the NFHS? I do. Can you imagine a very physical team wearing all skin tight undershirts for warm ups? I do not feel the governing body would allow this.

What are your thoughts?

[Raymond]

Originally Posted by pfan1981

Does anyone see this being addressed by the NFHS? I do. Can you imagine a very physical team wearing all skin tight undershirts for warm ups? I do not feel the governing body would allow this.

What are your thoughts?

Not sure I get the reference to "a very physical team".

[frezer11]

Originally Posted by pfan1981

Does anyone see this being addressed by the NFHS? I do. Can you imagine a very physical team wearing all skin tight undershirts for warm ups? I do not feel the governing body would allow this.

What are your thoughts?

Originally Posted by Raymond

Not sure I get the reference to "a very physical team".

I was wondering the same. I'm guessing you mean a team that appears physically intimidating that is doing this for the purpose of intimidation?

[pfan1981]

A team that is all jacked/ripped/etc

[so cal lurker]

Originally Posted by pfan1981

Does anyone see this being addressed by the NFHS? I do. Can you imagine a very physical team wearing all skin tight undershirts for warm ups? I do not feel the governing body would allow this.

What are your thoughts?

Since there aren't enough rules already, I think NFHS should instantly jump on this as a critical concern, just in case some teams comes up with this stupid idea and tries it. . .

[bob jenkins]

Originally Posted by so cal lurker

Since there aren't enough rules already, I think NFHS should instantly jump on this as a critical concern, just in case some teams comes up with this stupid idea and tries it. . .

And, since the team will just then go with tight jerseys, the rule will include a "coefficient of looseness" that must be measured and reported. The team roster must list accurate weights and all team members will be required to step on a scale before entering the game.

[bigbeardedbryan]

Originally Posted by bob jenkins

And, since the team will just then go with tight jerseys, the rule will include a "coefficient of looseness" that must be measured and reported. The team roster must list accurate weights and all team members will be required to step on a scale before entering the game.

They won't limit this expansion of micromanagement to players, though. For 2019 all officiating crews will be required to include one bald official and one official with a BMI >35.

[frezer11]

Originally Posted by bob jenkins

And, since the team will just then go with tight jerseys, the rule will include a "coefficient of looseness" that must be measured and reported. The team roster must list accurate weights and all team members will be required to step on a scale before entering the game.

"Coefficient of Looseness." As a physics teacher, I appreciate this new term so much, well done.

[bucky]

Originally Posted by BillyMac

Maybe by interpretation, but not by rule. The rule only states that players can't remove the jersey and/or pants/skirt within the visual confines of the playing area.

I disagree with it being considered an unsporting act. This is the part again, where in my opinion it involves skin.

Example: A1 is wearing a long-sleeve undershirt beneath his jersey. The jersey gets blood on it. A1, at the end of his bench, removes the jersey. IMO: I do not see that as being an unsporting act.

Now, same scenario, but A1 is not wearing an undershirt. I would err on the side of that being unsporting, since there is an exposed torso.

Example 2: A1 is wearing a long-sleeve undershirt beneath his jersey. A1 receives his 5th foul. Upon getting to the bench, A1 removes his jersey in disgust. IMO: I see that as being an unsporting act.

I feel, again just my opinion, that the intent of the NFHS was two-fold. One, it was to prevent exposed torsos (skin) and two, it was to penalize players removing jerseys in disgust.

I will try and follow the rules on it but if I encounter a player removing a jersey (not in disgust) with an undershirt, I would be hard-pressed to call a T.

[BillyMac]

Originally Posted by bucky

... in my opinion it involves skin.

Originally Posted by BillyMac

Is it the intent of the NFHS that players not show any underwear (undershirt), or skin, within the visual confines of the playing area, before, or during the game (under the jurisdiction of the officials)?

By rule, I don't believe that an undershirt exempts a player from this rule.