The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Basketball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Thu Jan 11, 2018, 09:40am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Earth- For Now
Posts: 872
Quote:
Originally Posted by crosscountry55 View Post
How about just count to 10 and then call the violation?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
10 seconds only applies once the ball is at the FT shooter's disposal.

As I understand it, this is to curb delays before that. Some guys like to walk around and do all kind of stuff before stepping to the line. Russell Westbrook was a regular culprit of this. Some have even suggested this has contributed to his FT % dropping nearly 14% this season compared to last.

I'm not sure how consequential it is overall but for some reason I like the way they administer it.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Thu Jan 11, 2018, 10:54am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,039
Quote:
Originally Posted by VaTerp View Post
10 seconds only applies once the ball is at the FT shooter's disposal.

So, if the rule is the same as NFHS, put the ball on the floor and start counting. Or, if players were taking too much time to get in place, call a DOG. Use the rules in place, don't change the official's mechanics to accommodate.
__________________
If some rules are never enforced, then why do they exist?
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Thu Jan 11, 2018, 12:38pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Usa
Posts: 943
Quote:
Originally Posted by bucky View Post
So, if the rule is the same as NFHS, put the ball on the floor and start counting. Or, if players were taking too much time to get in place, call a DOG. Use the rules in place, don't change the official's mechanics to accommodate.
Perhaps you'd favor us with a dissertation, based on your boundless NBA rules expertise, on the relevant rules at play in this situation. Please distinguish from 1st throw and 2nd throw, if you please.
__________________
Prettys Womans in your city
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Thu Jan 11, 2018, 12:43pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Earth- For Now
Posts: 872
Quote:
Originally Posted by bucky View Post
So, if the rule is the same as NFHS, put the ball on the floor and start counting. Or, if players were taking too much time to get in place, call a DOG. Use the rules in place, don't change the official's mechanics to accommodate.
OMG the accommodating horror of changing the mechanic of administering a FT.

Thanks but no thanks. I'll take the way the NBA chose to deal with it over having the L walk up the FT line and place the ball down.....and then have the C initiate a count.

Last edited by VaTerp; Thu Jan 11, 2018 at 02:19pm.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Thu Jan 11, 2018, 02:17pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Virginia
Posts: 546
Quote:
Originally Posted by bucky View Post
So, if the rule is the same as NFHS, put the ball on the floor and start counting. Or, if players were taking too much time to get in place, call a DOG. Use the rules in place, don't change the official's mechanics to accommodate.
Well if you wanted to put the ball on the floor and start a count, having the C administer the free throw makes it easier to do that too.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Thu Jan 11, 2018, 02:27pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,039
Quote:
Originally Posted by HokiePaul View Post
Well if you wanted to put the ball on the floor and start a count, having the C administer the free throw makes it easier to do that too.
Perhaps, however the distance traveled to the FT line by the C to do that is basically the same as the L.
__________________
If some rules are never enforced, then why do they exist?
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Thu Jan 11, 2018, 05:25pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Wyoming
Posts: 683
Quote:
Originally Posted by VaTerp View Post
OMG the accommodating horror of changing the mechanic of administering a FT.

Thanks but no thanks. I'll take the way the NBA chose to deal with it over having the L walk up the FT line and place the ball down.....and then have the C initiate a count.
Quote:
Originally Posted by HokiePaul View Post
Well if you wanted to put the ball on the floor and start a count, having the C administer the free throw makes it easier to do that too.
Quote:
Originally Posted by bucky View Post
Perhaps, however the distance traveled to the FT line by the C to do that is basically the same as the L.
All irrelevant. You don't use resumption of play on a FT, its a delay of game if anything.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Sat Jan 13, 2018, 04:09am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: In the offseason.
Posts: 12,264
Quote:
Originally Posted by frezer11 View Post
All irrelevant. You don't use resumption of play on a FT, its a delay of game if anything.
That is news to me. Citation?
__________________
Owner/Developer of RefTown.com
Commissioner, Portland Basketball Officials Association
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Sat Jan 13, 2018, 08:27am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 18,241
Quote:
Originally Posted by Camron Rust View Post
That is news to me. Citation?
After a TO, ROP is used for both.

Not after a TO, if A1 isn't at the spot for a throw-in, put the ball on the floor. If A1 is not available for a FT, it's a T. (And, yes, ther's plenty of game management to do before we get to either of those results, of course)
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old Sat Jan 13, 2018, 10:34am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 1,966
Quote:
Originally Posted by frezer11 View Post
All irrelevant. You don't use resumption of play on a FT, its a delay of game if anything.
You do if it’s after a timeout or intermission (NFHS).
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old Sun Jan 14, 2018, 10:23pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Wyoming
Posts: 683
Quote:
Originally Posted by Camron Rust View Post
That is news to me. Citation?
Quote:
Originally Posted by SC Official View Post
You do if it’s after a timeout or intermission (NFHS).
First off, I did look, and don't deny that I'm incorrect. Rules clearly state that you do use ROP after a timeout or intermission. Now all that said, why? Can you (or anyone else) help clarify this for me? Why place the ball on the ground and begin the count? And the reason I ask is because the way I read and interpret the rules, the free thrower is not allowed to be outside of the semicircle until after the release (9-1-3-e), so the moment you place the ball on the floor (at the thrower's disposal), then they are simultaneously violating, and as this is an offensive violation, the ball should immediately become dead. I don't see a provision in the rules that allows the shooter to enter the semicircle and attempt the shot. What am I missing?
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Admin Technical & Free Throw??? tophat67 Basketball 5 Mon Feb 06, 2012 04:32pm
Free Throw Admin The_Rookie Basketball 22 Sun Jan 09, 2011 08:54pm
Free throw admin screw up........ dsimp8 Basketball 39 Tue Nov 27, 2007 01:44pm
free throw admin... bdub712 Basketball 21 Thu Jan 12, 2006 10:18am
Technical Free Throw Admin WAZebra Basketball 9 Fri Jan 23, 2004 11:34am


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:52am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1