Free Throw admin- NBA

[HokiePaul]

Originally Posted by bucky

So, if the rule is the same as NFHS, put the ball on the floor and start counting. Or, if players were taking too much time to get in place, call a DOG. Use the rules in place, don't change the official's mechanics to accommodate.

Well if you wanted to put the ball on the floor and start a count, having the C administer the free throw makes it easier to do that too.

[bucky]

Originally Posted by HokiePaul

Well if you wanted to put the ball on the floor and start a count, having the C administer the free throw makes it easier to do that too.

Perhaps, however the distance traveled to the FT line by the C to do that is basically the same as the L.

[frezer11]

Originally Posted by VaTerp

OMG the accommodating horror of changing the mechanic of administering a FT.

Thanks but no thanks. I'll take the way the NBA chose to deal with it over having the L walk up the FT line and place the ball down.....and then have the C initiate a count.

Originally Posted by HokiePaul

Well if you wanted to put the ball on the floor and start a count, having the C administer the free throw makes it easier to do that too.

Originally Posted by bucky

Perhaps, however the distance traveled to the FT line by the C to do that is basically the same as the L.

All irrelevant. You don't use resumption of play on a FT, its a delay of game if anything.

[Camron Rust]

Originally Posted by frezer11

All irrelevant. You don't use resumption of play on a FT, its a delay of game if anything.

That is news to me. Citation?

[bob jenkins]

Originally Posted by Camron Rust

That is news to me. Citation?

After a TO, ROP is used for both.

Not after a TO, if A1 isn't at the spot for a throw-in, put the ball on the floor. If A1 is not available for a FT, it's a T. (And, yes, ther's plenty of game management to do before we get to either of those results, of course)

[SC Official]

Originally Posted by frezer11

All irrelevant. You don't use resumption of play on a FT, its a delay of game if anything.

You do if it’s after a timeout or intermission (NFHS).

[frezer11]

Originally Posted by Camron Rust

That is news to me. Citation?

Originally Posted by SC Official

You do if it’s after a timeout or intermission (NFHS).

First off, I did look, and don't deny that I'm incorrect. Rules clearly state that you do use ROP after a timeout or intermission. Now all that said, why? Can you (or anyone else) help clarify this for me? Why place the ball on the ground and begin the count? And the reason I ask is because the way I read and interpret the rules, the free thrower is not allowed to be outside of the semicircle until after the release (9-1-3-e), so the moment you place the ball on the floor (at the thrower's disposal), then they are simultaneously violating, and as this is an offensive violation, the ball should immediately become dead. I don't see a provision in the rules that allows the shooter to enter the semicircle and attempt the shot. What am I missing?

[BillyMac]

Originally Posted by frezer11

I don't see a provision in the rules that allows the shooter to enter the semicircle and attempt the shot.

NFHS: Request, and be granted, a timeout will avoid a ten second violation.

[frezer11]

Originally Posted by BillyMac

NFHS: Request, and be granted, a timeout will avoid a ten second violation.

True, but I'll go back to the original quandary, this should be considered an immediate violation on the shooter the moment it is at his disposal, so I don't know how you can call a timeout if a violation would occur first.