![]() |
|
|
|||
So - did anyone ever figure out the purpose of the original question?
Hint: Obstruction before the runner reached first on a caught fly ball. ![]()
__________________
Rich Ives Different does not equate to wrong |
|
|||
I think we knew that. The problem was the last sentence didn't make any sense (in the real world). If it was just ignored, then the answer to the OP (ignore the OBS on a caught fly) was obvious.
|
|
|||
And maybe the lurkers would like to see the answer.
__________________
Rich Ives Different does not equate to wrong |
|
|||
I didn't have that question so I don't know what the possible answers were. I would hope that one of the answers is: "The umpire shall call the obstruction when it happens, allow the play to continue, and call the batter out on the catch by F9."
|
|
|||
Quote:
Incorrect choices (w/ my abbrev. of BR) were: - Since the BR was still able to reach first base, the contact created by the pitcher is ignored - There cannot be obstruction in the infield when the batted ball is in the outfield - All runners, including the BR, are awarded one base. |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
NCAA Question | mattmets | Football | 5 | Sat Sep 22, 2012 11:14pm |
NCAA W Sub Question | SCalScoreKeeper | Basketball | 3 | Sun Feb 05, 2012 03:38pm |
NCAA question | zm1283 | Basketball | 2 | Sun Jan 23, 2011 12:02am |
NCAA Rule change? - Question #57 NCAA Test | ljudge | Football | 2 | Wed Jun 04, 2008 10:21am |
NCAA Question | dumbref | Football | 9 | Wed Nov 09, 2005 01:41pm |