![]() |
|
|||
|
String theory for NFHS?
In a discussion with a high school umpire about a batted ball hitting a runner, I got the impression that they use the string theory to determine whether or not a batted ball has passed a fielder. Is this the case for NFHS?
I know the MLB rulebook says (k) A fair ball touches him on fair territory before touching a fielder. If a fair ball goes through, or by, an infielder, and touches a runner immediately back of him, or touches the runner after having been deflected by a fielder, the umpire shall not declare the runner out for being touched by a batted ball. In making such decision the umpire must be convinced that the ball passed through, or by, the fielder, and that no other infielder had the chance to make a play on the ball. What does the NFHS rulebook say?? |
| Bookmarks |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Theory behind B and C positions | bossman72 | Baseball | 29 | Mon Apr 06, 2009 09:38am |
| Conspiracy Theory | mick | Basketball | 2 | Sat Sep 16, 2006 11:41pm |
| Umpiring theory | CecilOne | Softball | 13 | Wed Jun 08, 2005 02:42pm |
| Theory and Practice | Nevadaref | Basketball | 25 | Sat Jan 01, 2005 12:42pm |
| Theory behind the muffed punt...? | EricSeattle | Football | 8 | Mon Oct 18, 2004 03:10pm |