|
|||
Theory behind B and C positions
I was asked a question about positioning last weekend- "Why with R3 only are we in C position?" I didn't have a good answer and I mentioned something about 'playing the percentages.' He then came back with "Well, why don't we go to B when there's 2 outs since the percentages say that the play is going to be at first?" Once again, I had no answer.
So, I defer my answers for this guy to you guys Why are we in the positions mandated by our mechanics books? |
|
|||
I'm only in B with runners on first, first and third, or bases loaded. Everything else is C with runners on. Personally, I don't have a problem making a call on a play at first when I start in C. Just gain some ground toward first and get a good angle and you're fine. I did notice tonight that if a ball is hit to F6 and he has to charge it, you had better be ready to move if you're in C if he is going to throw to first.
|
|
|||
Quote:
Some prefer C, but like you stated, I like to be close to the play. But, I've worked with other groups who mandate move to C. Playing percentages, what is it, less than 5% of plays at 3rd, so why do we spend so much time worrying about 3rd?? Thanks David |
|
|||
Quote:
Peace
__________________
Let us get into "Good Trouble." ----------------------------------------------------------- Charles Michael “Mick” Chambers (1947-2010) |
|
|||
Why C?
I hate to be so old now, I remember "old school stuff"....
The old timers taught me that "being ahead of the runner" is the important thing, that is why many people are in C even with R3. You may say that you can't be ahead of the runner in C, but many times that run is the important runner in the game, and if there is a play on him at #B, it can be a significant play in the game. The concepts that are so important in teaching mechanics today, like "angle over distance" and "cover the money play" were not as emphasized as they are now. when I went to school in the 1980's neither of these concepts were even discussed. |
|
|||
Quote:
It's not only the "percentages," it's the time to move, and the type of call. On a pick to third, the umpire will not have much time to move, already has an angle, and closer will be better for seeing (or at least selling) the tag play -- and most of these will be "close". On a grounder with a throw to first, the umpire has plenty of time to move, sometimes the play will not be close, and distance doesn't matter as much on a "force play" (sic). |
|
|||
I know I stand with 2 outs in "B"...Im sure I read that in the CCA or the Red Book.
you are also in "C" in cause of a pickoff.
__________________
"My greatest fear is that when I die, my wife will sell my golf clubs for what I told her I paid for them." |
|
|||
newbie question - I've watched 3 games this week. In 2 0f the 3 games - 2 person system, the BU was in C with R1 on first. We follow Fed here. This goes against what the manual says. I asked and was told that they go to C in this sit because they can turn and face first from C at the pitch. they get a "great" angle and have a slim profile to the batter/ball if hit towards them. I was also told that being a rook - I should follow the manual. Is this common?
__________________
When I want your opinion - I'll give it to you! |
|
|||
Quote:
|
|
|||
Personally, if you're playing percentages with R1...your odds of play at 2B versus a pickoff at 1B are far greater. I love working C with R1 because I feel it gives me a significantly better angle to make a call on a SB attempt at 2B. HOWEVER...I'm very hesitant to sit in C...sometimes if I see that F1 doesn't have a good move to 1B...I will go to C because if somebody's going to be picked at 1B, the 90 yr old grandma in the stands will be able to see that he's out.
Get in the best angle to see the percentage play..esp w/ 2-man...where you already give up lots of angles.
__________________
It's like Deja Vu all over again |
|
|||
Quote:
I could see a veteran umpire getting away with it, but for the younger umpires, the coach is going to eat your lunch making the call from that far away. Thanks David |
|
|||
The same reasoning applies to why you should be in C with R3. Out here, coaches will wonder why you are in B to see a pick at 3rd. They expect BU to be in C, which sets up a more natural angle to a play behind R3, plus you're a lot closer to the tag play, which is what they want to see.
__________________
Matthew 15:14, 1 Corinthians 1:23-25 |
|
|||
Quote:
I have been hit once off of a metal bat and luckily nothing major happened. I felt some pain for a while but nothing earth shattering. I simply had no time to react. If there is R3 and we have a Right hand power hitter up, I go to B if it's a lefty I go to "C". In other words I try and go opposite of the persons power alley. Also, I do not know about the rest of you but when the particpants use metal I am in a much "deeper" position then I would be if wood is used. Nothing like a good ole fashion wood bat game. Pete Booth
__________________
Peter M. Booth |
Bookmarks |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Can anyone explain the theory behind the superwide stance? | Dakota | Softball | 19 | Thu Jul 19, 2007 03:17pm |
Conspiracy Theory | mick | Basketball | 2 | Sat Sep 16, 2006 11:41pm |
Umpiring theory | CecilOne | Softball | 13 | Wed Jun 08, 2005 02:42pm |
Theory and Practice | Nevadaref | Basketball | 25 | Sat Jan 01, 2005 12:42pm |
Theory behind the muffed punt...? | EricSeattle | Football | 8 | Mon Oct 18, 2004 03:10pm |