![]() |
|
|||
Quote:
This is an umpire forum. Things are often discussed on a purely academic basis. Hey, I can think of a lot of rules that I think could be better in EVERY system of rules. Even baseball! I find it interesting when so many organizations see a single event is such different ways. They all mostly agree on the infraction but differ wildly on how to enforce the penalty. It's my opinion, that some organizations have a more logical penalty system. No big deal! For years, people have criticized NFHS baseball rules. And, over a period of time, the NFHS has adapted has been somewhat responsive to many complaints - to their credit. The common complaint was that it needlessly strayed from more common expectations and interpretations of baseball as people have grown to know the game. Let's face it, OBR has been around a lot longer than NFHS. I'm not saying that makes it better, but it is what people seem to expect from a baseball game. People shouldn't have to go to a baseball game and be surprised by the rule applications? I have a daughter who plays competitive fastpitch softball. We play in many ASA tournaments throughout the season. They're great! A great organization. The rules seem to work ... but that doesn't mean there aren't "holes" in those rules. I think delaying an obstruction call with a lingering uncertain award that could go either way happens to be a bad rule. Man, don't get angry! I don't expect the world to change just because *I* don't agree with it. Hey, you don't have candles burning around an ASA rulebook that you pay homage to on a nightly basis, do you? [g] |
Bookmarks |
|
|