Thread: ASA obstruction
View Single Post
  #30 (permalink)  
Old Sun May 18, 2003, 03:05pm
David Emerling David Emerling is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Germantown, TN (east of Memphis)
Posts: 783
Quote:
Originally posted by IRISHMAFIA
Quote:
Originally posted by Roger Greene
And Mike fussed at me when all I did was point out that Pony has a special rule for rundowns, without making any comment about ASA or Fed!!

Bid Grin.

Roger Greene
Did not! Did not! DID NOT!!!

Well, maybe just a little. All I did was point out that I don't agree with that particular result of an obstruction call. I believe it makes umpires hesitate in making the proper call.

Yes, but that would be a delayed dead under EVERY system of rules on this entire planet.

In the play you describe above, there was no direct play on the obstructed runner - so you *should* allow the ball to remain live.

Your example does not support the case for leaving the ball to remain live when there is *direct* play on an obstructed runner.

Let me ask you to solve this:

ASA. R1. Batter gets a hit into the outfield. R1 is obstructed by F4. The BU sees and signals the obstruction. R1 attempts to advance to 3rd and is thrown out by the slimmest margine. The PU makes the out call at 3rd. Then F5 sees that the BR is attempting to advance to 2nd and a throw is made in an attempt to stop that runner. The runner ends up in a lengthy rundown and is ultimately tagged out.

While the rundown was going on, what do you do if ...

(a) The runner who was called OUT at 3rd, leaves the field and enters her dugout - thinking she is out. Afterall, that's what the PU called her.

(b) or, the same runner trots home, touches the plate, picks up the bat of her teammate and enters her dugout? Count the run? Stand by for the world's biggest sh*tstorm from the defense. "But you called her OUT! How can she score???" Explain THAT one.

David Emerling
Memphis, TN



Reply With Quote