Ruling on an U3K

[Dakota]

Originally Posted by luvthegame

...unless it was something intentional...

Citation, please.

BTW, you sure are defensive.

And, you DID read something into to the OP, and that was that nothing happened that was not stated. Given the lack of detail, that was an assumption. I'm not disagreeing with your ruling, given your assumptions.

[luvthegame]

Originally Posted by Dakota

Citation, please.

BTW, you sure are defensive. GEESH....make up yer mind...I was offensive last time...lol

And, you DID read something into to the OP, and that was that nothing happened that was not stated. Given the lack of detail, that was an assumption. I'm not disagreeing with your ruling, given your assumptions.

My opinion was not an assumption...just a decision made based on the information provided and stated (which for me, in this case, did not require reading anything more or assuming anything more into it)...maybe you needed more info. That's ok too.....

Looks like the OP got his question answered...so all is good!!

[Dakota]

Originally Posted by Dakota

...BTW, you sure are defensive

Who said they were mutually exclusive!

[luvthegame]

Sounds versatile and flexible.