Quote:
Originally Posted by luvthegame
Your question does read into the play as it was described.....
|
Actually, so does your ruling, since the OP did not say what the batter's foot was doing or not doing. You assumed it was not moving. But, the OP did not say that. The OP does not say where the ball went or whether it died right there, rebounded or was imparted additional velocity by the moving foot.
You assumptions seem reasonable given the paucity of information, but they still are assumptions.