![]() |
|
|
|||
Ruling on an U3K
A play in a Phillies game the other night got me thinking, & couldn't find it in the book...
U3K, any contact of the ball with the B/R's person should result in Interference with catcher's chance to make an out? As soon as it bounces from mitt & hits the side of the batter's foot, am I killing the play & ringing him up (and sending stealing runners back to their base)? ASA of course, Phillies reference irrelevant Last edited by jmkupka; Mon Sep 14, 2009 at 11:35am. Reason: clarifying ASA rules |
|
|||
Quote:
F. When the batter-runner interferes with: 6. (Fast Pitch) a dropped third strike. No intent is necessary.
__________________
The bat issue in softball is as much about liability, insurance and litigation as it is about competition, inflated egos and softball. |
|
|||
Quote:
But is an "act" necessary? Since act is part of the interference definition. In other words does the offensive player have to do something to interfer? (in reference to OP, ball hitting mitt then BR) Last edited by luvthegame; Mon Sep 14, 2009 at 01:09pm. |
|
|||
Quote:
To me, the prior rulings are taking the case over the line. The case book rulings refer to the batter kicking the ball while exiting; that is interference. Being in the batter's box when the catcher muffs the ball into the batter isn't interference. There has to be an "act" which interferes. Intent not required doesn't change the definition that an action is required. Use the same mental criteria as the batter standing in the batter's box when the catcher wants to throw the ball. Unless a rule specificly requires a participant to yield a space (batter must allow a play at the plate, on-deck batters and base coaches must yield to allow a play on the ball), passively remaining in a legal space isn't interference, even if the ball touches them there.
__________________
Steve ASA/ISF/NCAA/NFHS/PGF |
|
|||
IMO, "As soon as" is the improper way to look at this potential INT call.
A ball hitting the foot is not necessarily INT. I think, as with all calls, especially INT, you review in your mind and assess and make your call (or non call). Give it a moment, dont do anything "as soon as". Whats the big rush. if you do have INT, everything is going back anyway, so you definately have a time to assess the situation to determine whether there is INT and a call to be made.
__________________
ASA, NCAA, NFHS |
|
|||
Quote:
I told the umps that I thought there was a case play on this and I would get back to them, but now that I am looking for it - I dont see one. Does anyone know of a case play which involves D3K int?
__________________
ASA, NCAA, NFHS |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Your ruling? | mcrowder | Softball | 30 | Thu Apr 12, 2007 11:06am |
FED DH Ruling | largeone59 | Baseball | 8 | Tue Aug 02, 2005 05:47am |
ruling? | xxssmen | Basketball | 3 | Tue Feb 08, 2005 11:44am |
What would be the ruling here? | swordfish | Football | 7 | Fri Jan 30, 2004 08:00am |
What is the Ruling? | Metrodom | Basketball | 15 | Mon Jan 26, 2004 08:43pm |