The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Softball
Your ruling? Your ruling?
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
Page 2 of 3 1 2 3
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #16 (permalink)  
Old Fri Mar 30, 2007, 09:33pm
Official Forum Member
  
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: USA
Posts: 14,565
Quote:
Originally Posted by TwoBits
I'm curious as to the answer. No one else seems to be.

I'm rethinking my answer though. If the BR had already touched first base, then ran past R3, then R3 is no longer entitled to first base,
Why not? What is keeping R3 from returning to 1B? Then again, why would R3 continue after the third out of the inning has been executed?
__________________
The bat issue in softball is as much about liability, insurance and litigation as it is about competition, inflated egos and softball.
Reply With Quote
  #17 (permalink)  
Old Fri Mar 30, 2007, 11:44pm
Official Forum Member
  
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 143
You want newbies? How about non-umps?

Assuming it is ASA fastpitch and 12U or above, I see it like Wadeintothem, all the way down to his description of R3.

R1 and R2 left their bases legally after the pitch, and scored before the 3rd out, which was when BR passed R3.
__________________
Matt
Not an official,
just a full-time dad,
part-time coach,
here to learn.
Reply With Quote
  #18 (permalink)  
Old Sat Mar 31, 2007, 03:25am
Official Forum Member
  
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Back in TX, formerly Seattle area
Posts: 1,279
Quote:
Originally Posted by IRISHMAFIA
Why not? What is keeping R3 from returning to 1B? Then again, why would R3 continue after the third out of the inning has been executed?
If they're too stupid to come in out of the rain (or be off and running with two outs), they're likely one of those candidates to keep going with 3 outs...
__________________
John
An ucking fidiot
Reply With Quote
  #19 (permalink)  
Old Sat Mar 31, 2007, 11:45am
Official Forum Member
  
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: USA
Posts: 14,565
Quote:
Originally Posted by bkbjones
If they're too stupid to come in out of the rain (or be off and running with two outs), they're likely one of those candidates to keep going with 3 outs...
No argument there, John. However, I'm really more interested in the response to the first two parts of my post.
__________________
The bat issue in softball is as much about liability, insurance and litigation as it is about competition, inflated egos and softball.
Reply With Quote
  #20 (permalink)  
Old Mon Apr 02, 2007, 12:19pm
Official Forum Member
  
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Little Elm, TX (NW Dallas)
Posts: 4,047
Guess this one was easier here than at our meeting the other night. Some normally rules-savvy umpires were having trouble with the idea that even though the sitch provided had BR passing unintentionally, a bright BR could do this intentionally to prevent a tag on R3 (which WOULD nullify the runs, obviously)

Should have known this group would be smarter than the general populus.
__________________
"Many baseball fans look upon an umpire as a sort of necessary evil to the luxury of baseball, like the odor that follows an automobile." - Hall of Fame Pitcher Christy Mathewson
Reply With Quote
  #21 (permalink)  
Old Mon Apr 02, 2007, 11:19pm
Official Forum Member
  
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 45
Let me get this straight...

The force out at 2nd would have obviously nullified any runs scored on the play, but by R3 running backwards and being passed by the BR, the 3rd out was called on the BR and was not a force.

Tagging 2nd would have prevented the runs. Chasing R3 backward did not. Interesting.
Reply With Quote
  #22 (permalink)  
Old Tue Apr 03, 2007, 06:46am
Official Forum Member
  
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: USA
Posts: 14,565
Quote:
Originally Posted by tribefan1952
Let me get this straight...

The force out at 2nd would have obviously nullified any runs scored on the play, but by R3 running backwards and being passed by the BR, the 3rd out was called on the BR and was not a force.

Tagging 2nd would have prevented the runs. Chasing R3 backward did not. Interesting.
If the defense does their job and catches the ball in flight, no runs would score.

If F4 plays for the force at 2B, no runs would have scored unless the BR passes R3 prior to a play at 2nd.

Don't feel bad for the defense, their inept play gave the runs to the offense, not the rule book.
__________________
The bat issue in softball is as much about liability, insurance and litigation as it is about competition, inflated egos and softball.
Reply With Quote
  #23 (permalink)  
Old Tue Apr 03, 2007, 10:32am
Official Forum Member
  
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 16
Would it be possible for the defense to go for the 4th out of the inning to get the force out at 2nd and nullify the runs due to the force ?
Reply With Quote
  #24 (permalink)  
Old Tue Apr 03, 2007, 10:44am
Official Forum Member
  
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 727
Quote:
Originally Posted by umpire george
Would it be possible for the defense to go for the 4th out of the inning to get the force out at 2nd and nullify the runs due to the force ?
I think a fourth out is only recognized in an appeal situation, correct?
__________________
"Not all heroes have time to pose for sculptors...some still have papers to grade."
Reply With Quote
  #25 (permalink)  
Old Tue Apr 03, 2007, 11:57am
Official Forum Member
  
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Upstate, SC
Posts: 440
What force out at 2nd? The BR is retired, so R3 is no longer forced to 2nd and can retreat to 1st, no?
__________________
Just Tryin' to Learn...
Reply With Quote
  #26 (permalink)  
Old Tue Apr 03, 2007, 01:26pm
Official Forum Member
  
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: USA
Posts: 14,565
Quote:
Originally Posted by umpire george
Would it be possible for the defense to go for the 4th out of the inning to get the force out at 2nd and nullify the runs due to the force ?
There is no fourth out available, nor is there a force out available.
__________________
The bat issue in softball is as much about liability, insurance and litigation as it is about competition, inflated egos and softball.
Reply With Quote
  #27 (permalink)  
Old Tue Apr 03, 2007, 01:48pm
Official Forum Member
  
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Little Elm, TX (NW Dallas)
Posts: 4,047
Quote:
Originally Posted by JefferMC
What force out at 2nd? The BR is retired, so R3 is no longer forced to 2nd and can retreat to 1st, no?
Yes..........
__________________
"Many baseball fans look upon an umpire as a sort of necessary evil to the luxury of baseball, like the odor that follows an automobile." - Hall of Fame Pitcher Christy Mathewson
Reply With Quote
  #28 (permalink)  
Old Wed Apr 11, 2007, 11:36pm
Official Forum Member
  
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: NC
Posts: 4,361
Quote:
Originally Posted by IRISHMAFIA
Speaking ASA SP.

None, either R1 or R2 is out for leaving the base prior to the ball reaching the plate.
Actually, I think you're referring to 8-7-R. If so, then I'll have to disagree with ya there. Since it was phrased "as the ball crosses the plate," I'm going to assume that the ball has reached the plate. In that case, both runners, leaving at that exact (yeah, right... I know, I know... no such thing) moment should be fine.

I'm with wadeintothem on this one, but hey... I've been known to be wrong, even when I'm right.
__________________
Dave

I haven't decided if I should call it from the dugout or the outfield. Apparently, both have really great views!

Screw green, it ain't easy being blue!

I won't be coming here that much anymore. I might check in now and again.
Reply With Quote
  #29 (permalink)  
Old Thu Apr 12, 2007, 06:33am
Official Forum Member
  
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: USA
Posts: 14,565
Quote:
Originally Posted by NCASAUmp
Actually, I think you're referring to 8-7-R. If so, then I'll have to disagree with ya there. Since it was phrased "as the ball crosses the plate," I'm going to assume that the ball has reached the plate. In that case, both runners, leaving at that exact (yeah, right... I know, I know... no such thing) moment should be fine.

I'm with wadeintothem on this one, but hey... I've been known to be wrong, even when I'm right.
Originally, the OP stated the runners were off with the pitch. The author since then had edited the scenario.
__________________
The bat issue in softball is as much about liability, insurance and litigation as it is about competition, inflated egos and softball.
Reply With Quote
  #30 (permalink)  
Old Thu Apr 12, 2007, 09:47am
Official Forum Member
  
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: NC
Posts: 4,361
Talking
Quote:
Originally Posted by IRISHMAFIA
Originally, the OP stated the runners were off with the pitch. The author since then had edited the scenario.
Ahhh... Then touche. You'd be absolutely correct, sir!
__________________
Dave

I haven't decided if I should call it from the dugout or the outfield. Apparently, both have really great views!

Screw green, it ain't easy being blue!

I won't be coming here that much anymore. I might check in now and again.
Reply With Quote
Reply
Page 2 of 3 1 2 3

Bookmarks

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Need help on an XFL ruling bossman72 Football 6 Tue Jul 12, 2005 09:25pm
Ruling LongIslandZebra Baseball 14 Sun Jul 10, 2005 12:17pm
OBR Ruling Dentonump Baseball 11 Fri Jun 24, 2005 02:16pm
OBR ruling? tornado Baseball 6 Sun Aug 01, 2004 02:05pm
Need help on a ruling kimo Softball 34 Thu Aug 14, 2003 04:45pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:37am.

The Official Forum - Archive - Top


Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1