|
Wed Apr 28, 2004, 03:21pm
|
|||
|
|||
|
when another violation is being played upon
But in this case, there wasn't a violation, regardless of what the defense thought it was playing upon or what the runner thought. Still, I admit that statement could be understood differently. Another ambiguity. Had the runner actually left 1B too soon, she would have been out regardless of the OBS or the rule about not being out between the two bases. Don't get me wrong. I'm not saying that ASA's wording is air tight. In court, you might well win your case, but it's not what ASA means.
__________________
greymule More whiskey—and fresh horses for my men! Roll Tide! 
|
| Bookmarks |
|
|
Threaded Mode
