Forum: Basketball
Fri May 01, 2009, 08:30pm
|
Replies: 53
Views: 4,632
|
Forum: Basketball
Sat Apr 18, 2009, 05:38am
|
Replies: 18
Views: 5,468
|
Forum: Basketball
Fri Apr 10, 2009, 02:20pm
|
Replies: 21
Views: 2,230
|
Forum: Basketball
Mon Apr 06, 2009, 07:17am
|
Replies: 20
Views: 2,300
|
Forum: Basketball
Mon Apr 06, 2009, 07:13am
|
Replies: 18
Views: 2,105
|
Forum: Basketball
Wed Apr 01, 2009, 10:38am
|
Replies: 208
Views: 16,490
Still trying to find somebody that will agree...
Still trying to find somebody that will agree with your nonsense?:D
Why don't you put down something like:
<b>"Do not respond unless you also think that officials should watch for phantom fouls...
|
Forum: Basketball
Tue Mar 31, 2009, 02:04pm
|
Replies: 208
Views: 16,490
Note that I finished your statement above to...
Note that I finished your statement above to reflect your adamant opinion that officials <b>must</b> call plays of this type out of their primary. As noted before, my opinion is that your opinion is...
|
Forum: Basketball
Tue Mar 31, 2009, 06:55am
|
Replies: 208
Views: 16,490
Yes.
The quote by refguy referring to...
Yes.
The quote by refguy referring to people who disagreed with his position was "I have trouble believing that they know how to apply the basic rules of officiating." I thought that statement...
|
Forum: Basketball
Mon Mar 30, 2009, 08:01pm
|
Replies: 208
Views: 16,490
|
Forum: Basketball
Mon Mar 30, 2009, 05:54pm
|
Replies: 208
Views: 16,490
1) The only D1 official that I am sure is...
1) The only D1 official that I am sure is currently posting on this forum has already gone on record as saying that he did not see a foul on this play. And another poster in this thread, who was a...
|
Forum: Basketball
Sun Mar 29, 2009, 07:40am
|
Replies: 17
Views: 2,133
Nonsense.
You're not signalling a no-call....
Nonsense.
You're not signalling a no-call. You're signalling who touched the ball last in the front court. There's nothing the matter with conveying that information to your partner(s) to ensure...
|
Forum: Basketball
Sat Mar 28, 2009, 07:20pm
|
Replies: 208
Views: 16,490
As I said, it may be argumentive if a foul...
As I said, it may be argumentive if a foul actually occurred on this play. Fwiw though, I agree completely with your analysis above. I have watched the play numerous times, slo-mo and otherwise, and...
|
Forum: Basketball
Sat Mar 28, 2009, 07:15pm
|
Replies: 208
Views: 16,490
|
Forum: Basketball
Sat Mar 28, 2009, 06:07pm
|
Replies: 208
Views: 16,490
|
Forum: Basketball
Sat Mar 28, 2009, 12:30pm
|
Replies: 208
Views: 16,490
|
Forum: Basketball
Sat Mar 28, 2009, 12:17pm
|
Replies: 208
Views: 16,490
|
Forum: Basketball
Sat Mar 28, 2009, 09:06am
|
Replies: 208
Views: 16,490
It was not a foul.
Your analysis is a pile...
It was not a foul.
Your analysis is a pile of crap. The PLAY did NOT start in the lead's primary. The throw-in may have started in the lead's primary but the PLAY occurred directly in front of the...
|
Forum: Basketball
Wed Mar 25, 2009, 10:22am
|
Replies: 56
Views: 4,171
|
Forum: Basketball
Wed Mar 25, 2009, 09:42am
|
Replies: 23
Views: 1,978
|
Forum: Basketball
Thu Mar 12, 2009, 05:45pm
|
Replies: 14
Views: 1,205
|
Forum: Basketball
Wed Mar 11, 2009, 07:19pm
|
Replies: 39
Views: 3,855
|
Forum: Basketball
Tue Mar 10, 2009, 08:43am
|
Replies: 23
Views: 2,198
There are rules covering this situation.
...
There are rules covering this situation.
According to the NFHS rules:
1) The clock must be started when the missed free throw is touched by B1. That's rule 5-9-3- "If a free throw is not...
|
Forum: Basketball
Thu Mar 05, 2009, 08:56pm
|
Replies: 9
Views: 1,436
Hitting the ball after it has hit the backboard...
Hitting the ball after it has hit the backboard doesn't necessarily equate to an automatic goaltending call. Was the whole ball completely above the ring when it first touched the backboard? If not,...
|
Forum: Basketball
Tue Mar 03, 2009, 08:02am
|
Replies: 16
Views: 2,620
|
Forum: Basketball
Mon Mar 02, 2009, 08:42pm
|
Replies: 16
Views: 2,620
|