Sun Sep 02, 2012, 08:09pm
|
|
Official Forum Member
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: NE Ohio
Posts: 7,620
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by mtridge
It would be a OPI. Case book 7.5.13 If ineligible catches the ball beyond the LOS it is OPI
|
Not OPI. NFHS fixed this case play in the 2012 interps.
Quote:
Page 61, *7.5.13 SITUATION A: Ineligible receiver A2 is behind, in or beyond his neutral zone and has committed no act against a defender that could be considered pass interference when a forward pass by A1: (a) accidentally strikes him in the back; or (b) is muffed by him; or (c) is caught by him. RULING: In (a), there is no foul for illegal touching. In (b) and (c), it is illegal touching. and if beyond the line of scrimmage, would also be offensive pass interference. The acts in both (b) and (c) are intentional and not accidental as in (a). COMMENT: Game officials should be very clear in explaining penalty options if the same act constitutes more than one foul as listed above, as each of the fouls has a different penalty.
|
NFHS | 2012 NFHS Football Rules Interpretations
__________________
Cheers,
mb
|
Similar Threads
Hybrid Mode
