The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Football
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Wed Oct 21, 2009, 08:44am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: NE Ohio
Posts: 7,620
I disagree. The "spirit" of all-but-one is to simplify enforcements. The only simpler principle would be "all": enforce all fouls (with the usual exceptions) from the basic spot. Bringing back a scoring play because of a PF upfield is consistent with this spirit.

I still don't see what the big deal is. Individuals don't score, teams do. And a team may not score on a down during which they foul. Why, as an official, do I care whether they score?
__________________
Cheers,
mb
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Wed Oct 21, 2009, 09:26am
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Central Illinois
Posts: 391
Quote:
Originally Posted by mbyron View Post
I disagree. The "spirit" of all-but-one is to simplify enforcements. The only simpler principle would be "all": enforce all fouls (with the usual exceptions) from the basic spot. Bringing back a scoring play because of a PF upfield is consistent with this spirit.

I still don't see what the big deal is. Individuals don't score, teams do. And a team may not score on a down during which they foul. Why, as an official, do I care whether they score?
Hey, MB
I understand what you are saying. However, p. 77 of the 2009 NF rules with regard to penalty enforcement states,
Quote:
Enforcement philosophy is based on the fact that a team is given the advantage of the distance which is gained without assistance of a foul.
What distance is gained by a foul 40 yards behind the runner? This is my basis for stating the spirit of the all-but-one principle.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Wed Oct 21, 2009, 09:50am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: NE Ohio
Posts: 7,620
Quote:
Originally Posted by RadioBlue View Post
Hey, MB
I understand what you are saying. However, p. 77 of the 2009 NF rules with regard to penalty enforcement states,
Enforcement philosophy is based on the fact that a team is given the advantage of the distance which is gained without assistance of a foul.
What distance is gained by a foul 40 yards behind the runner? This is my basis for stating the spirit of the all-but-one principle.
If the foul occurred at the point of attack, this philosophy would be relevant. If I call a PF 40 yards upfield, it's a safety or sportsmanship issue, not an advantage issue.

If the scoring team wants their scores, they can tell their linemen to quit screwing around and play the game.
__________________
Cheers,
mb
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Did I handle this situation correctly? canadaump6 Baseball 18 Wed Jun 18, 2008 08:38pm
OOB, Did we handle this correctly hoosierref Basketball 6 Sat Jan 26, 2008 12:46pm
Did I handle my mistake correctly? kblehman Basketball 19 Thu Dec 13, 2007 05:09pm
Was this done correctly? Teigan Basketball 6 Thu Jan 04, 2007 10:22am
Did I handle this situation correctly? JollyJim Softball 15 Fri Sep 08, 2006 11:45pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:25pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1