View Single Post
  #22 (permalink)  
Old Wed Oct 21, 2009, 09:26am
RadioBlue RadioBlue is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Central Illinois
Posts: 391
Quote:
Originally Posted by mbyron View Post
I disagree. The "spirit" of all-but-one is to simplify enforcements. The only simpler principle would be "all": enforce all fouls (with the usual exceptions) from the basic spot. Bringing back a scoring play because of a PF upfield is consistent with this spirit.

I still don't see what the big deal is. Individuals don't score, teams do. And a team may not score on a down during which they foul. Why, as an official, do I care whether they score?
Hey, MB
I understand what you are saying. However, p. 77 of the 2009 NF rules with regard to penalty enforcement states,
Quote:
Enforcement philosophy is based on the fact that a team is given the advantage of the distance which is gained without assistance of a foul.
What distance is gained by a foul 40 yards behind the runner? This is my basis for stating the spirit of the all-but-one principle.
Reply With Quote