The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Football
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Tue May 12, 2009, 06:36pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,909
Anyway, NCAA switched to a 4 min. warning decades ago, and AFAIK never changed back.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Tue May 12, 2009, 08:44pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Great Britain
Posts: 244
Quote:
Originally Posted by Robert Goodman View Post
Anyway, NCAA switched to a 4 min. warning decades ago, and AFAIK never changed back.
The most recent NCAA Rule book I have immediately to hand is 2007 and it says 2 minute warning if no visible clocks.
__________________
Sorry Death, you lose.... It was Professor Plum!
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Wed May 13, 2009, 08:59am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,909
Quote:
Originally Posted by With_Two_Flakes View Post
The most recent NCAA Rule book I have immediately to hand is 2007 and it says 2 minute warning if no visible clocks.
I wonder when they switched back. I've seen so few games lately where official time wasn't visible, it never came up. Did Fed switch back to 2 mins. too?
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Sun May 17, 2009, 08:00pm
zys zys is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 6
Hello, everybody.

I´m working with dvasques with the translation and I have a doubt:

A.R. 7-3-3-I states:

At the snap, tight end A85 is on the line of scrimmage. Flanker A23 is two yards outside of A85 and is neither on his line of scrimmage nor in the backfield. RULING: A23 is in an illegal position and is an ineligible pass receiver. A85 is an eligible pass receiver since he is on the end of the line of scrimmage (Rules 2-21-2 and 2-27-4).

How is a player neither on the line of scrimmage nor in the backfield?
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Sun May 17, 2009, 08:28pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,305
He is what we call a "mugwump". By definition, it is possible to not be legally on the line of scrimmage nor legally in the backfield. When a player is in that position, he causes the formation to be illegal. (He is also ineligible)
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Mon May 18, 2009, 06:54am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: NE Ohio
Posts: 7,620
Quote:
Originally Posted by zys View Post
How is a player neither on the line of scrimmage nor in the backfield?
By his positioning, he does not meet the definition of being on the LOS nor of being in the backfield.

For example: too far back to be on the LOS (behind the snapper's hip) but too far forward to be in the backfield (even with the end's hip).
__________________
Cheers,
mb
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
AAU Issues AZ_REF Basketball 20 Mon Apr 09, 2007 10:09pm
Money issues Ohioref3 Football 5 Fri Nov 11, 2005 05:26pm
2 issues PSU213 Football 2 Sat Sep 18, 2004 02:02pm
Two issues MOFFICIAL Basketball 5 Fri Jan 09, 2004 07:45pm
Translation Please APHP Basketball 11 Tue Jan 29, 2002 09:35am


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:01am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1