![]() |
|
|||
Translation issues
Hello, everybody,
as some might remember, I'm from Brazil and I'm in the process of translating the NCAA rules to portuguese for use in the country. Right now I'm on the rule 6 and I just found an issue that I'd like to clarify so I don't make the wrong interpretation. Rule 6-1-3-a-3 says a. No Team A player may touch a free-kicked ball until after: 3. It touches any player, the ground, an official or anything beyond Team B's restraining line. I understand that has no effect over an onside kick try since Team A becomes eligible to receive the kick after it has crossed Team B's restraining line. But Rule 6-1-2-g says No Team A player may block an opponent until Team A is eligible to touch a free-kicked ball. Does that really means that on an onside kick try, Team A players have to wait for the ball to cross the line so they can block Team B and attempt a recovery of the kick? I'll be posting more questions as I have them on the translation process. Thanks for the help Last edited by dvasques; Fri Feb 20, 2009 at 11:54pm. |
|
|||
Quote:
|
|
|||
yes, but that still doesn't clear what I thought was the rule.
I thought that once the ball touched the ground (right after the kick) every player would be eligible to touch the ball and therefore Team A would be able to block Team B. I know... the ball touching the ground wouldn't make Team A eligible to recover the kick, but I thought it would at least allow them to block Team B. Am I wrong on this? |
|
|||
although I have had an insight while translating the Fair Catch rules, I'd still love for someone to clarify my doubts on my previous posts.
But I have now realized that the tactics of free kicking the ball into the ground so it can bunce up in the air on onside kicks might have to do with taking away the option of a Team B fair catch |
|
|||
The eligibility of a team A player to touch or recover the free kick has nothing to do with blocking an opponent from getting to the ball.
Team A players could block B players and interfere with their getting the ball until it has gone 10 yds. wherein the A players could then recover it. (after it has touched the ground AND gone 10 yds.) |
|
|||
Quote:
Last edited by Sonofanump; Sat Feb 21, 2009 at 12:09pm. |
|
|||
Quote:
And rule 6-1-3-a says Team A becomes eligible when Team B touches the ball; the ball breaks the plan and remains beyound Team B restraining line or; the ball touches the any player, the ground, an official or anything beyond Team B restraining line. Which, in my understanding, means Team A can't block Team B until the ball travels 10 yards. My first thought, when I read Rule 6-1-3-a, was that maybe it was supposed to read like this: The ball touches any player, the ground or an official. Or touches anything beyond 10 yeard. But that's not the case because Team A doesn't become eligible if a Team A player touches the ball before it travels 10 yards. Then I came to the conclusion that Team A can't block Team B on an onside kick until the ball travels 10 yards |
|
|||
Quote:
If you look at 6-5-6, it starts out by saying "While any free kick is in FLIGHT in or beyond the neutral zone..., K shall not: a. Touch the ball or R unless blocked into the ball or R, or to ward off a blocker; or b. Obstruct R's path to the ball. (This is the section on kick catching interference.) Thus, if the ball is kicked on the ground, these restrictions do not apply and K players can block R players. |
|
|||
Quote:
Quote:
![]()
__________________
Even if you’re on the right track, you’ll get run over if you just sit there. - Will Rogers |
|
|||
Quote:
The only way Team A would be eligible to block Team B before the ball goes 10 yards is if Team B comes forward and touches the ball in that first 10 yards. By doing that they "give permission" to Team A to block them. Great to hear you are continuing the move to NCAA rules from those NFL ones. |
|
|||
One thing I'd have to ask is what dvasques needs to do here. Is your job to translate the NCAA football rule book so you can present it as, "Here is the authentic current NCAA football rule book translated into Portugese."? Or are you operating as a "rules committee of 1", and just doing your own research? That is, do you have to "sell" the product to someone as, "Here is what has been formulated and tested by a large organiz'n for football?" Because if not, if you have nobody to answer to, why not just think it thru (preferably, but not necessarily, in consultation with others) and decide what makes sense for you, without regard to exactly what the existing rule book says?
For 80 years in American football, team B/R has been given opportunity to catch the free kicked ball, so that opp'ty is not to be interfered with. The different codes have slightly different criteria as to when that opportunity exists. In Canadian football there is no such opp'ty, but for over 50 years the receiving team but not the kicking team at a kickoff has been allowed to block before possession of the ball is gained. Why not just use that knowledge and formulate your own criteria? Robert in the Bronx |
|
|||
Just for the record, there does not appear to be any restriction againsts K blocking R before a grounded free kick has traveled past R's free kick line under the NFHS code.
If any free kick is touched by K, before it travels past the R free kick line, it is "first touching" and R will have the option to select possession at that point. (unless R touches the kick and thereafter during the down commits a foul, or if the penalty is accepted for any foul committed during the down. NF: 6.1.6) |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AAU Issues | AZ_REF | Basketball | 20 | Mon Apr 09, 2007 10:09pm |
Money issues | Ohioref3 | Football | 5 | Fri Nov 11, 2005 05:26pm |
2 issues | PSU213 | Football | 2 | Sat Sep 18, 2004 02:02pm |
Two issues | MOFFICIAL | Basketball | 5 | Fri Jan 09, 2004 07:45pm |
Translation Please | APHP | Basketball | 11 | Tue Jan 29, 2002 09:35am |