|
|||
Quote:
Here's where the rule applies. As soon as any of them take a position on the line between the ends, he's an exception--period. Up until he does that, there's no way in Hades that anyone can determine who the exceptions are. Eventually however, there will be at least five of them (including possibly the snapper). There may be more if a player takes a position under the exception and then because of a shift ends up somewhere other than between the ends. I understand completely why the numbering exception was inserted into the Fed rule book. Here's the reason, quoted from the Comments on the Rules Revisions in the 1982 rule book: They said it was done “…in order for a coach to more effectively use the talents of his players…in kicking situations.” In order to facilitate this rule, they needed also to add a definition for a scrimmage kick formation. Do I believe that the A11 is taking advantage of a 'loophole' in the numbering exception rule? Yes. Do I believe it's illegal as the rules are currently constructed? Absolutely not. Will the Fed deal with this for the 2009 season? Maybe...who knows. If so, the NCAA rule may be the way to go.
__________________
Bob M. |
Bookmarks |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
When the offense figured it out... | JBrew32 | Baseball | 5 | Wed Jun 20, 2007 10:19pm |
offense penalized | d1ref2b | Basketball | 75 | Fri Jan 05, 2007 11:04pm |
Offense Offsides | BobGP383 | Football | 10 | Sun Nov 12, 2006 09:02am |
Did the offense give up their at bat? | tskill | Baseball | 8 | Sat Apr 15, 2006 10:31pm |
Offense Confererence | DrC. | Baseball | 2 | Fri Sep 29, 2000 02:47pm |