Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Bob M.
REPLY: But since the A11 was not discussed in full committee at last weekend's Rules Committee Meeting in Indianapolis (and that is a fact), there will be no mention of the A11 (for or against) in the 2008 rule or case books...that is unless the Federation sets a new precedent.
|
However, it could still be addressed in the annual interpretations. I have no idea if it will or not.
It matters not to me. My state will be penalizing it under 9-9-4 as an unfair act. I'm gald I don't have to fool with the nonsense.