Quote:
|
Originally Posted by KurtBryan
** Thanks and Yes, I meant it has set a precedent by being utilized for 11 games in the 2007 season, and it should be assumed that it WILL be listed in the upcoming NFHS case book as being legal, thanks for clarifying that for us.
|
REPLY: But since the A11 was
not discussed in full committee at last weekend's Rules Committee Meeting in Indianapolis (and that is a fact), there will be no mention of the A11 (for or against) in the 2008 rule or case books...that is unless the Federation sets a new precedent.