NFHS Rules Changes Predictions/Rumors/Desires

[Robert E. Harrison]

How many actually call stepping out of bounds by offense or defense as a violation? If the defense does it you give the ball back to the offense and go and it is a turn over if the offense steps out.

Can we say gains an advantage by stepping out of bounds and go back to calling a charge if the defender seals of the endline by putting a foot on the line?

How many get tired of warning players and coaches for stepping OOB?

[PG_Ref]

Originally Posted by Robert E. Harrison

How many get tired of warning players and coaches for stepping OOB?

Stop warning and just blow the whistle.

[PG_Ref]

Let's add a mechanic for "tripping" and come up with a mechanic for "piling on the scrum" on a loose ball.

[Pantherdreams]

1 - Any support or freedoms they can give to encourage shot clock.

2- Allowing players on the lane to leave on the release, and eliminating the wiping off of made baskets for violations made by teammates on the lane.

3 - Any removal on restrictions or application of as many fashion police items as possible.

4 - 1 TC/PC mechanic.

5 - Lets make "over the back" an actual thing so that players/coaches/fans can acutally properly ask for something.

[JRutledge]

Originally Posted by Pantherdreams

5 - Lets make "over the back" an actual thing so that players/coaches/fans can acutally properly ask for something.

So how in the heck are you going to accomplish this? You would need to completely change rules to make the back special and probably would have to define (by changing other definitions) when this could take place. The verticality rules are already clear and in place. I do not want to add a rule that would get screwed up by the wording. And I think this is not going to happen.

Peace

[BillyMac]

Originally Posted by Pantherdreams

1 TC/PC mechanic.

Agree, but let's not forget that all team control fouls aren't exactly the same as all player control fouls.

[Camron Rust]

Originally Posted by BillyMac

Agree, but let's not forget that all team control fouls aren't exactly the same as all player control fouls.

What is different? (that matters).

As long as you move the airborne shooter reference to the team control foul rule, you no longer need the player control foul at all.

[BillyMac]

Originally Posted by Camron Rust

What is different? As long as you move the airborne shooter reference to the team control foul rule, you no longer need the player control foul at all.

The second sentence in your post tells me that you are already aware of the difference, and have a remedy for the difference in the mechanics of the signal(s), a change in the rule along with a change in the signal chart.

Originally Posted by Pantherdreams

5 - Lets make "over the back" an actual thing so that players/coaches/fans can acutally properly ask for something.

Hell no, we can't let them win.