Quote:
Originally Posted by Rich
They don't at that level because the officials are experienced and know the repercussions of getting into a long, drawn out discussion over it. They know that settling it quickly (regardless of whether they come out with a block or a charge) is the right thing for the game and for their credibility. They're embarrassed enough at that point.
Now, let's consider how this could play out in a HS game with officials who would actually argue about the call or be obstinate and get into a long discussion about this. How would THEY resolve things? Flip a coin?
At higher levels and in my games (because I feel I'm adequately aware of perception and its importance) I'm certain we could handle this the NCAAW way. I'm not sure about the garden variety freshman/JV game, though.
|
I totally disagree it is right for the game. You choose someone is going to suggest why you choose one call over the other. The fact that you give it to both and no one is going to be happy IMO is better as you are not just giving it to someone over the other and you will try to avoid the situation all together. That is also why it does not happen very often IMO. It happens, but not even once a season for most officials. I have had some situations where you could suggest it might have happen, but it was avoided. Just because you pick one of the calls does not mean someone is not going to be very happy or that they will not question the motives of the individuals making the decision.
Peace