|
|||
Falling before contact
We've debated this before on here, but here's the play that I had last night and want to hear thoughts...
NFHS: Secondary defender B1 establishes LGP under the basket. Before being contacted by ball handler A1, B1 begins to fall backwards such that he does not "take" the contact and that A1 doesn't initiate any contact. We know that a defender can turn or duck to absorb the shock of imminent contact, but in my judgment that's not what B1 was doing. I ruled a blocking foul. However, I'm not convinced that the rules necessarily support my decision even though I've seen this play adjudicated identically in other games (NCAA and NFHS). My justification is that B1's action put airborne A1 in a dangerous position returning to the floor. Is there anything in the rules that supports a blocking foul on this play? |
|
|||
I think this has come up repeatedly here before.
Was there any contact at all? If there was no contact you have no rules support for a blocking foul. "Putting a player in a dangerous position" absent contact cannot be a common foul. By rule, you could go with a technical for 10-4-6f. In application, I have a hard time calling a T for actions similar to what you described and have probably called similar plays a block in the past. But there is no rules support for a blocking foul without contact simply for falling down before contact in an effort to draw a charge. |
|
|||
There isn't unless you feel their actions put them outside of what was legal. Otherwise, I tend to no call these if I feel a player feel before some contact. It might not be pretty, but I cannot justify calling a foul on a defender if little to no contact takes place and by all accounts they were legal.
Peace
__________________
Let us get into "Good Trouble." ----------------------------------------------------------- Charles Michael “Mick” Chambers (1947-2010) |
|
|||
Quote:
__________________
Owner/Developer of RefTown.com Commissioner, Portland Basketball Officials Association |
|
|||
IMO
You cannot call a block here. The defense didn't do anything illegal and you had no contact so no grounds for a common foul at all. The issues we encounter are: A) is when there is marginal/little contact but now the defender ends up on ground. B) If you feel this was intended to fake being fouled (FYI I find that language/semantics to be impossibly limiting) Not to open a different can of worms than the OP but in the case of A my feelings are that the defense is allowed to move backwards/sideways to protect themself. If they want to go backwards head/butt first instead of feet first that is on them I'm moving on with a no call. In the case of B. I think you had better have something in their actions/reactions to indicate they expect a call. Throwing a T because someone is soft, scared, young, anticipating or off balance is rough.
__________________
Coach: Hey ref I'll make sure you can get out of here right after the game! Me: Thanks, but why the big rush. Coach: Oh I thought you must have a big date . . .we're not the only ones your planning on F$%&ing tonite are we! |
|
||||
Quote:
__________________
Sprinkles are for winners. |
|
|||
Quote:
To align with the majority of opinions, I, too, more often than not have a no-call here. I'm just saying that I've seen it called a block and called it a block myself for the reason stated above. |
|
|||
Quote:
__________________
Owner/Developer of RefTown.com Commissioner, Portland Basketball Officials Association |
|
||||
Quote:
We just don't get to pretend there's any rule backing for it.
__________________
Sprinkles are for winners. |
|
|||
Quote:
Back to the point as you've stated I'm just apt to no call it and move on. The idea of whacking a kid or calling them for a foul for "protecting" themselves, especially around here with the recent emphasis on concussion training and protocols for all players. coaches and parents . . .just seems to be too big a can of worms for me to open.
__________________
Coach: Hey ref I'll make sure you can get out of here right after the game! Me: Thanks, but why the big rush. Coach: Oh I thought you must have a big date . . .we're not the only ones your planning on F$%&ing tonite are we! |
|
|||
Does anyone have a problem on OP play if the feet of the defender on the floor makes contact with the offensive player landing or rebound the miss and I call a blocking foul?
__________________
BigT "The rookie" |
|
|||
Curiously, for those that are using the term verticality here and cylinder here you know those have specific meaning. And someone falling isn't vertical or within their cylinder.
Depending on how egregiously early the fall is its a block on any contact with an airborne shooter. Most of the times the defenders properly just brace for impact but if they are half way to the floor and then there's contact, I'm not no-calling it or calling a PC.
__________________
in OS I trust |
Bookmarks |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Flopping to Falling and everywhere in between. | Pantherdreams | Basketball | 42 | Tue Dec 10, 2013 04:46pm |
fALLING OUT OF BOUNDS | jcarter | Basketball | 3 | Tue Feb 13, 2007 02:58pm |
Falling Down | carldog | Basketball | 3 | Mon Dec 27, 2004 03:24pm |
Falling down with the ball | gostars | Basketball | 23 | Wed Dec 08, 2004 09:27am |
Falling Asleep | EMD | Baseball | 5 | Tue Nov 09, 2004 10:50pm |