The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Basketball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Wed Dec 07, 2016, 11:55pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 187
Quote:
Originally Posted by JRutledge View Post
You do not see this anywhere because it was an overreaction and taking a position that even the NCAA backed off of. There were many times where any slight contact with an opponent would have been an intentional or flagrant when the player was doing normal basketball movements. If I recall they did not make a definitive statement across the board. But I know my state made it clear that we were not to just make this an "automatic" but to judge the nature of the contact. For example if a player is coming down a rebounding the ball and hitting the opponent in the head with an elbow where the player might not have even realized the opponent was there. After all players do try to grab the ball and come down with their elbows in some kind of way. Now our state clarified this for us here, maybe you need to get clarification from your people. The NF is just going to give what they feel needs to be addressed and the specifics are going to come from your jurisdiction as that is their overall policy it seems.


Peace
I guess there are 2 things to consider:

1.Was the action intentional.
2.How bad was the contact if there was any.

Intentional & Bad = Flagrant 2/Disqualifying foul

Intentional & Minor = Flagrant 2/Disqualifying foul

Intentional no contact = Technical Foul/Unsportsmanship Foul.

Unintentional & Bad = Flagrant 2/Disqualifying foul

Unintentional & Minor = Flagrant 1/Unsportsmanship foul
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Thu Dec 08, 2016, 12:12pm
Do not give a damn!!
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: On the border
Posts: 30,540
Quote:
Originally Posted by potato View Post
I guess there are 2 things to consider:

1.Was the action intentional.
2.How bad was the contact if there was any.

Intentional & Bad = Flagrant 2/Disqualifying foul

Intentional & Minor = Flagrant 2/Disqualifying foul

Intentional no contact = Technical Foul/Unsportsmanship Foul.

Unintentional & Bad = Flagrant 2/Disqualifying foul

Unintentional & Minor = Flagrant 1/Unsportsmanship foul
If we are talking elbow plays, calling a technical foul is not appropriate. This is violation or nothing at either NF or NCAA level.

Peace
__________________
Let us get into "Good Trouble."
-----------------------------------------------------------
Charles Michael “Mick” Chambers (1947-2010)
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Thu Dec 08, 2016, 03:36pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 15,015
Quote:
Originally Posted by JRutledge View Post
If we are talking elbow plays, calling a technical foul is not appropriate. This is violation or nothing at either NF or NCAA level.

Peace
Unless the official deems it an attempt to strike the opponent. He did write that it was an intentional act.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
flagrant foul/flagrant technical splitveer Basketball 6 Tue Feb 16, 2010 01:05pm
Flagrant foul MelbRef Basketball 23 Thu Dec 24, 2009 01:26am
Flagrant foul just another ref Basketball 1 Wed Jan 16, 2008 02:14am
First Flagrant Foul. JRutledge Basketball 19 Wed Jan 15, 2003 04:09pm
Flagrant Foul Redneck Ref Basketball 3 Thu Jan 17, 2002 11:48pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:09am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1