Casebook play 9.2.2 Question.

[Altor]

There were two made goals in the OP. The OP's question was a little vague, but he meant to ask what would happen if the second goal was never made and B was just passing/dribbling the ball around. Nevadaref assumed he meant what if A had never scored.

[Adam]

Originally Posted by Altor

There were two made goals in the OP. The OP's question was a little vague, but he meant to ask what would happen if the second goal was never made and B was just passing/dribbling the ball around. Nevadaref assumed he meant what if A had never scored.

I read it the way Nevadaref did at first.

[Dad]

Originally Posted by Adam

I read it the way Nevadaref did at first.

How is that? I assumed he meant the second shot as the first shot miss wouldn't make any sense for his question on when you call the violation. There is no violation on a miss because the player never went OOB for the throw-in.

[Altor]

Congratulations, you successfully parsed the vague question. Not everybody did. Now we are all on the same page. Move on.

[Adam]

Originally Posted by Dad

How is that? I assumed he meant the second shot as the first shot miss wouldn't make any sense for his question on when you call the violation. There is no violation on a miss because the player never went OOB for the throw-in.

The short answer is we get a lot of questions that have very basic answers, especially this time of year.