How do you emphasize a rule that doesn't exist?

[Scrapper1]

Originally Posted by bballref3966

The NFHS did nothing to improve the backcourt rule or team control. Not that I'm surprised.

Here's a new article under the point of interruption rule (4-36)

“ART. 3 . . . When the ball remains live after a violation or foul (as in 4-19-8). . .”

What does 4-19-8 (double fouls) have to do with anything?

[Sharpshooternes]

Originally Posted by Scrapper1

What does 4-19-8 (double fouls) have to do with anything?

Probably referring to a Blarge. The ball remains live on a block/charge on a shot. It is actually a double foul, not a PC and a blocking foul.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk