The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Basketball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Closed Thread
 
LinkBack (1) Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  1 links from elsewhere to this Post. Click to view. #1 (permalink)  
Old Mon Sep 14, 2015, 01:33pm
This IS My Social Life
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: at L, T, or C
Posts: 2,379
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rich View Post
. . . but then forgot to put it in the rules proper.
As I await delivery of the new rulebook and casebook, I had imagined they'd add this as a violation somewhere.
Did you get a look at the new rulebook?
__________________
Making Every Effort to Be in the Right Place at the Right Time, Looking at the Right Thing to Make the Right Call
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Mon Sep 14, 2015, 01:34pm
Rich's Avatar
Get away from me, Steve.
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 15,794
Quote:
Originally Posted by Freddy View Post
As I await delivery of the new rulebook and casebook, I had imagined they'd add this as a violation somewhere.
Did you get a look at the new rulebook?
It's not in the NFHS Central Hub yet and we haven't received them yet in my state.

I hear the mechanics manual has been completely overhauled, though, so it will be interesting to see what changes they snuck in there.
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Mon Sep 14, 2015, 01:44pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 401
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rich View Post
I hear the mechanics manual has been completely overhauled, though, so it will be interesting to see what changes they snuck in there.
I've only skimmed it, but the thing I immediately noticed was that the new manual contains a description of each signal and how the NFHS wants each signal made.

The other thing I immediately checked for was whether or not they're allowing two-handed reporting. Alas, still required to use one hand according to the NFHS.
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Mon Sep 14, 2015, 04:03pm
9/11 - Never Forget
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 5,642
Send a message via Yahoo to grunewar
Quote:
Originally Posted by bballref3966 View Post
The other thing I immediately checked for was whether or not they're allowing two-handed reporting. Alas, still required to use one hand according to the NFHS.
Yep, that sure stops em from using two hands here (sarc).
__________________
There was the person who sent ten puns to friends, with the hope that at least one of the puns would make them laugh. No pun in ten did.
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Mon Sep 14, 2015, 01:37pm
Do not give a damn!!
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: On the border
Posts: 30,579
Quote:
Originally Posted by Freddy View Post
As I await delivery of the new rulebook and casebook, I had imagined they'd add this as a violation somewhere.
Did you get a look at the new rulebook?
I have the rulebooks and casebook and I do not see this at all. But maybe I will do some investigation to be sure of that. I just did not notice any change in the rules this year yet.

Peace
__________________
Let us get into "Good Trouble."
-----------------------------------------------------------
Charles Michael “Mick” Chambers (1947-2010)
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Mon Sep 14, 2015, 01:44pm
Lighten up, Francis.
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 4,709
Quote:
Originally Posted by Freddy View Post
Did you get a look at the new rulebook?
I just got mine today and it's not listed as a violation in Rule 8 or 9.
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Mon Sep 14, 2015, 01:47pm
This IS My Social Life
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: at L, T, or C
Posts: 2,379
Quote:
Originally Posted by Scrapper1 View Post
I just got mine today and it's not listed as a violation in Rule 8 or 9.
Is there any casebook citation? Perhaps something along the lines of ignoring the violation when a foul against the free thrower follows?
__________________
Making Every Effort to Be in the Right Place at the Right Time, Looking at the Right Thing to Make the Right Call
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Mon Sep 14, 2015, 01:50pm
Lighten up, Francis.
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 4,709
Quote:
Originally Posted by Freddy View Post
Is there any casebook citation? Perhaps something along the lines of ignoring the violation when a foul against the free thrower follows?
Nope, the case plays for 9.1 seem to be the same as last year.
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Mon Sep 14, 2015, 01:51pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 401
The NFHS did nothing to improve the backcourt rule or team control. Not that I'm surprised.

Here's a new article under the point of interruption rule (4-36)

“ART. 3 . . . When the ball remains live after a violation or foul (as in 4-19-8) during a try for goal, the point of interruption is determined to be when the ball becomes dead following the violation or foul.”
  #10 (permalink)  
Old Mon Sep 14, 2015, 02:44pm
Lighten up, Francis.
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 4,709
Quote:
Originally Posted by bballref3966 View Post
The NFHS did nothing to improve the backcourt rule or team control. Not that I'm surprised.

Here's a new article under the point of interruption rule (4-36)

“ART. 3 . . . When the ball remains live after a violation or foul (as in 4-19-8). . .”
What does 4-19-8 (double fouls) have to do with anything?
  #11 (permalink)  
Old Thu Sep 17, 2015, 04:53pm
C'mon man!!
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 966
Quote:
Originally Posted by Scrapper1 View Post
What does 4-19-8 (double fouls) have to do with anything?

Probably referring to a Blarge. The ball remains live on a block/charge on a shot. It is actually a double foul, not a PC and a blocking foul.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
  #12 (permalink)  
Old Sun Sep 20, 2015, 07:43pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 2,193
Quote:
I happen to think that it's important for the rules, case plays and POEs to be internally consistent.
Unsure how anyone could think this is anything but reasonable.

Editors make mistakes, but this is a pretty big one. A point of emphasis on something that isn't a rule. Wow.
  #13 (permalink)  
Old Sun Sep 20, 2015, 09:36pm
Esteemed Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 23,473
Another Nice Mess ...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Texas Aggie View Post
Editors make mistakes, but this is a pretty big one. A point of emphasis on something that isn't a rule. Wow.
"A point of emphasis on something that isn't a rule."

Yes, that pretty much sums up this entire mess.

__________________
"For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life." (John 3:16)

“I was in prison and you came to visit me.” (Matthew 25:36)
Closed Thread

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


LinkBacks (?)
LinkBack to this Thread: https://forum.officiating.com/basketball/100103-how-do-you-emphasize-rule-doesnt-exist.html
Posted By For Type Date
New Free Throw Rule for ’15/16: Was This an Issue for You Last Season? This thread Pingback Sat Sep 26, 2015 06:38pm

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
"Letter..." or "Spirit..." -- Can the Second Exist Without the First First Freddy Basketball 24 Thu Sep 20, 2012 08:00am
Coach's team loses cause he doesn't know the rule... Ref_in_Alberta Basketball 12 Sat Feb 28, 2009 07:25am
Blarge--does it exist? Jurassic Referee Basketball 92 Sat Jan 27, 2007 01:45pm
Doesn't look back rule apply here? mg43 Softball 18 Thu Mar 23, 2006 01:44pm
It Just Doesn't Get Any Better Than This rainmaker Basketball 17 Sun Feb 15, 2004 11:42am


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:03am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1