|
|||
Catch/Appeal
R1. R1 is off with the pitch. Ball is hit into the gap. F8 makes a great catch. R1, who is in between 2nd and 3rd starts to retreat. He re-touches 2nd. However, F8 rockets a wild throw back into the infield which goes into the dugout. At the time the ball enters DBT, R1 is in between 1st and 2nd (on his way back to 1st).
Since the ball is dead, has R1 lost his chance to tag-up; therefore, can be out on appeal? So you have, R1 awarded two bases but subject to be called out on appeal? Thanks for your help. |
|
|||
tjones1,
In the sitch you describe, the R1 is NOT subject to an appeal under ANY rule code - as long as he proceeds to and touches 1B prior to (again) touching 2B. If, on the other hand, had the R1 had still been between 2B & 3B at the time the throw went out of play, under FED rules he would NOT be able to "complete" his retouch of 1B, while under OBR rules he would. JM
__________________
Finally, be courteous, impartial and firm, and so compel respect from all. |
|
|||
Quote:
1. I doubt the defense or their coaches would figure it out that he can be subject to an appeal at 1B. (Very few coaches around here would know this) 2. What if R1 tries to go back to retouch 1B? As BU, do you simply ignore him or verbally state that he can't retouch? |
|
|||
These rules have always been confusing because they vary from code to code. Since you may go a year or more of umpiring without seeing it, it is hard to remember, as well. I actually cannot remember the last time I saw this type of play-maybe 6 or 7 years ago?
I have always thought it to be a very strange thing to see a guy going backwards to touch a base when time has been called and he has been awarded bases. It just looks weird. |
|
|||
Catch/Appeal
Quote:
|
|
|||
correct, but I think JM is saying that if he touches 2b, he can't return to retouch 1b...my contention is that the base that he couldn't touch would be 3b to unable him to legally retouch 1b. I'm not saying he's wrong...but I think the OBR interp is what I said in this post...the fed post wouldn't really make sense but it is FED I guess.
__________________
It's like Deja Vu all over again |
|
|||
Quote:
In OBR if you touch the next base from your current position after the time the ball went into DBT you cannot return to touch your original base. In OBR if the runner is awarded two bases from his position at the time of the throw - subject to revision upon a retouch. So if a runner is between 2B and 3B, but has to retouch 1B, you award him home - then change it to 3B IF he goes back to retouch 1B. The rationale is to not do something that would alert the defense to the appeal possibility. If he doesn't go back and retouch he is subject to appeal. If the appeal is made he is out. If no appeal is made he scores.
__________________
Rich Ives Different does not equate to wrong Last edited by Rich Ives; Wed Aug 19, 2009 at 01:56pm. |
|
|||
Quote:
In FED, a runner cannot legally retouch if he is on of byond his "advance base" WHEN the ball becomes dead. (And, yes, somewhere in the rules, there's an exception to prevent a smart F9 from intentionally throwing the ball out of play to "trap" R1 who has advanced to far.) In OBR, a runner cannot legally retouch if he continues to advance to the next base AFTER the ball becomes dead. So, in zm1283's play (R1 between second and third when the ball goes dead, but returns to first): In FED, let him run, but call him out on appeal if the defense appeals his failure to tag up at first. IF the defense doesn't appeal, leave him at third. In OBR, the retouch is legal, so any appeal at first would be denied. The runner is awarded third. (MLBUM has it as something like, the runner is first awarded home, then the award is changed to third if R1 retoouches first.) |
|
|||
Quote:
Also, wouldn't he be awarded home if he's between 2B and 3B when the ball is released from F8? So do you tell him he can't retouch first, and award him home and let the defense figure it out from there? |
|
|||
Quote:
|
|
|||
2 bases from his last legally occupied base. 1B is the last base legally occupied since he has a retouch obligation at 1B on a caught fly ball.
__________________
It's like Deja Vu all over again |
|
|||
Quote:
Have I mentioned that I HATE FED rules? |
|
|||
Quote:
__________________
When in doubt, bang 'em out! Ozzy |
Bookmarks |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Ankiel injury - Catch/No-catch? | TxUmp | Baseball | 17 | Wed May 06, 2009 11:26pm |
BU help PU with catch/no catch in infield? | Angler | Softball | 4 | Thu Mar 13, 2008 10:20am |
Catch or no catch(foul ball)? | illiniwek8 | Baseball | 2 | Sat Mar 25, 2006 07:16pm |
To catch, or not to catch; the coin, that is... | chiefgil | Football | 13 | Wed Aug 11, 2004 06:40am |
OBR Appeal | tasoump | Baseball | 1 | Tue Jul 02, 2002 02:39pm |