The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Baseball

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Wed Feb 28, 2001, 05:52pm
Rich's Avatar
Get away from me, Steve.
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 15,770
Let's talk some baseball.

Last night, our association watched the Jim Evans Balk video. Excellent - I highly recommend.

I came up with a good discussion play as a result of watching the video.

PLAY: R1, outs irrelevant. R1 breaks for second just as F1 starts a pickoff move to first. Surprised by R1, F1 quickly fakes to first while engaged, but almost immediately turns and throws the ball into center field trying to retire R1 at second base.

Result?

Rich
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Wed Feb 28, 2001, 05:59pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Posts: 243
Send a message via ICQ to Patrick Szalapski
Quote:
Originally posted by Rich Fronheiser
Let's talk some baseball.

Last night, our association watched the Jim Evans Balk video. Excellent - I highly recommend.

I came up with a good discussion play as a result of watching the video.

PLAY: R1, outs irrelevant. R1 breaks for second just as F1 starts a pickoff move to first. Surprised by R1, F1 quickly fakes to first while engaged, but almost immediately turns and throws the ball into center field trying to retire R1 at second base.
I've got a balk. You said "fake" and "almost" above. Seems to me that this "almost" wasn't a "fake" to first!

P-Sz
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Wed Feb 28, 2001, 06:10pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Spokane, WA
Posts: 4,222
Sure its a balk, but then what?

Yes, you've got a balk, but it's the word "immediately" that is key.

Was this a continuous motion so that you would wait for the play to end before enforcing the balk, or was there a definite stop after the balk and before the throw so we could rule the play dead at the time of the balk? (Pitcher doesn't throw, kill play.)

Hard to guess without seeing it. If there was enough time to yell balk, and then "Time" before the throw, I'd kill the play believing the pitcher responded to my yell of balk. Runner to second.

If not, then I've got continous action and the ball is alive .

Timing is everything.
__________________
GB
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Wed Feb 28, 2001, 06:22pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Posts: 711
Send a message via ICQ to Jim Porter Send a message via Yahoo to Jim Porter
Quote:
Originally posted by Rich Fronheiser
Let's talk some baseball.

Last night, our association watched the Jim Evans Balk video. Excellent - I highly recommend.

I came up with a good discussion play as a result of watching the video.

PLAY: R1, outs irrelevant. R1 breaks for second just as F1 starts a pickoff move to first. Surprised by R1, F1 quickly fakes to first while engaged, but almost immediately turns and throws the ball into center field trying to retire R1 at second base.

Result?

Rich
Ignore the balk because R1, the only runner, advanced to second safely as a result of the play. (The batter is not considered because he did not become a batter-runner.)

R1 may advance beyond second base at his own peril.

(I suppose this is where I find out that the ball was dead as soon as the pitcher completed the fake or feint - but I'll stick with my answer because you said he turned and threw, "almost immediately.")

__________________
Jim Porter
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Wed Feb 28, 2001, 06:25pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Posts: 813
Fed ruling: Immediate dead ball upon balk.

OBR Ruling: Balk called with play still occurring and ball should not be killed until all play stops. R1 apparently reaches second and may advance at his own risk beyond that. Balk is now ignored.

Just my opinion,

Steve
Member
EWS


Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Wed Feb 28, 2001, 06:56pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 561
Talking We have the technology....

..under OBR. It is explained in the NAPBL Umpire Manual Section 6.7 Balk Mechanic p62ff.

The move by the pitcher to pick off at 1st is not a balk until the precise moment the pitcher fails to deliver the throw. In other words, the failure to throw IS the balk.

If the pitcher throws wild to any base before the umpire can call "Time" and kill the play, then his throw has immediately followed the balk, and under OBR 8.05 Penalty AR1 the ball remains alive and the runner may continue to advance beyond the base to which he would be entitled as the result of the balk at the risk of being put out.

The pitcher's throw puts "a play" in progress. If the umpire has NOT called "Time" killing play before the pitcher throws, to 2nd base in this case, then he can't call "Time" afterward until "all play has ceased (runners have stopped trying to advance and a fielder is in possession of the ball in the infield)". [NAPBL 6.7 Mechanic 8, OBR 5.10(h)]

Bottom line: Don't call "Time" until all play has ceased OR until you are certain there will be no play at all, except in the specific circumstances provide under the NAPBL interpretations.

Cheers,

[Edited by Warren Willson on Feb 28th, 2001 at 05:59 PM]
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Wed Feb 28, 2001, 07:42pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Posts: 711
Send a message via ICQ to Jim Porter Send a message via Yahoo to Jim Porter
Upon further review...

I'm going to change my answer.

The ball was indeed dead the moment the pitcher failed to complete the delivery of the throw to first.

Jim Evans puts it this way:

"When a pitcher balks, one of three contingencies may occur: (1) the pitcher stops his delivery and retains possession of the ball, (2) the pitcher continues his delivery and completes his throw to a base, or (3) the pitcher continues his delivery and completes a pitch to the batter."

Since the pitcher did not complete delivery of his initial throw, the ball is dead at that moment, and the balk is enforced.

Even though the failure to complete the throw was the balk, the pitcher still retained possession and did not complete the throw. That means that the attempt to throw to second was a second delivery, the ball should have been ruled dead at that time, and the balk penalty enforced.

Interesting situation.
__________________
Jim Porter
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Wed Feb 28, 2001, 08:18pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 561
Re: Upon further review...

Quote:
Originally posted by Jim Porter
I'm going to change my answer.

The ball was indeed dead the moment the pitcher failed to complete the delivery of the throw to first.

Jim Evans puts it this way:

"When a pitcher balks, one of three contingencies may occur: (1) the pitcher stops his delivery and retains possession of the ball, (2) the pitcher continues his delivery and completes his throw to a base, or (3) the pitcher continues his delivery and completes a pitch to the batter."

Since the pitcher did not complete delivery of his initial throw, the ball is dead at that moment, and the balk is enforced.
Hmmmm.... looks like I might have been dead wrong on this one (how's that for a sick pun, eh?) Curse you, Fronheiser! It appears that the mechanics at NAPBL Sect 6.7 #1 and #8 may conflict on this one.

The bottom line appears to be that the ONLY way that OBR 8.05 Penalty AR1 can apply is by a breach of OBR 8.05(c) - failure to step directly to the base. There is no other instance, given this ruling, that can result in a balk immediately followed by a wild throw to a base, and the corollary is that the ball is ALWAYS immediately dead any time the pitcher feints to 1st.

Cheers,
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Wed Feb 28, 2001, 08:25pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Posts: 813
Thumbs down Don't take my Foster's !!!!

Quote:
Originally posted by Jim Porter

Even though the failure to complete the throw was the balk, the pitcher still retained possession and did not complete the throw. That means that the attempt to throw to second was a second delivery, the ball should have been ruled dead at that time, and the balk penalty enforced.

Interesting situation. [/B]
I must respectfully disagree, Jim. With R1 en route to 2nd base (play still occurring) the ball should not be killed for the exact reason shown in the situation. The defense errored beyond the balk (favoring the offended offense). Offense may achieve more than the award of the balk (at their own risk).

Who knows, R1 may be related to Warren and thinking about that cold Foster's waiting for him just keep going around 2nd, 3rd, home, the dugout, and right out to the tailgate. If you kill the ball, you blow his opportunity at that successful play. Take away the base, okay------but don't take away the Foster's or you will likely have a protest.

Just my opinion,

Steve
Member
EWS
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old Wed Feb 28, 2001, 08:34pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Spokane, WA
Posts: 4,222
What the heck, I was almost there anyway.

Originally posted by Jim Porter


Jim Evans puts it this way:

"When a pitcher balks, one of three contingencies may occur: (1) the pitcher stops his delivery and retains possession of the ball, (2) the pitcher continues his delivery and completes his throw to a base, or (3) the pitcher continues his delivery and completes a pitch to the batter."


Well, that's not a far leap from where I was. I was looking for a stop after the fake to kill the ball. I can accept Evans #1 above. Balk, dead ball runner to second.

Good play, Rich.

__________________
GB
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old Wed Feb 28, 2001, 08:34pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Edinburg, TX
Posts: 1,212
Send a message via ICQ to Carl Childress
Re: Don't take my Foster's !!!!

Quote:
Originally posted by Bfair
Quote:
Originally posted by Jim Porter

Even though the failure to complete the throw was the balk, the pitcher still retained possession and did not complete the throw. That means that the attempt to throw to second was a second delivery, the ball should have been ruled dead at that time, and the balk penalty enforced.

Interesting situation.
I must respectfully disagree, Jim. With R1 en route to 2nd base (play still occurring) the ball should not be killed for the exact reason shown in the situation. The defense errored beyond the balk (favoring the offended offense). Offense may achieve more than the award of the balk (at their own risk).[/B]
It's an interesting question for discussion, but the history of baseball solves our problem.

We are accustomed to thinking of "continuing plays" as they relate to the defensive team losing the right to appeal baserunning errors. In that respect the balk to first followed by a throw to second is a continuing play.

But the balk interpretation deals with a "continuous" play. And that's not at all the same thing. Once the first movement toward the base is not completed, any movement by the pitcher thereafter is the second movement. (Nobody can dispute that. grin) A continuing event can have many movements; just look at Beethoven's Fifth Symphony, for example.

But a continuous event ends the instant a second event occurs.

Kill the ball, enforce the balk. Jim Evans, Jim Porter, and Carl Childress all agree.

__________________
Papa C
My website
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old Wed Feb 28, 2001, 08:43pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 561
Cool Re: Don't take my Foster's !!!!

Quote:
Originally posted by Carl Childress
Kill the ball, enforce the balk. Jim Evans, Jim Porter, and Carl Childress all agree.
So did Warren Willson, at 7.18PM which was probably while you were still composing this reply. I believe even Garth Benham has boarded this band wagon while it was rolling.

What do you think about my conclusion that the only way for OBR 8.05 Penalty AR1 to apply is for a breach of OBR 8.05(c)?

Cheers,

[Edited by Warren Willson on Feb 28th, 2001 at 08:03 PM]
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old Thu Mar 01, 2001, 02:22am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Posts: 711
Send a message via ICQ to Jim Porter Send a message via Yahoo to Jim Porter
Re: Don't take my Foster's !!!!

Quote:
Originally posted by Bfair
I must respectfully disagree, Jim. With R1 en route to 2nd base (play still occurring) the ball should not be killed for the exact reason shown in the situation. The defense errored beyond the balk (favoring the offended offense). Offense may achieve more than the award of the balk (at their own risk).

Steve
Steve,

It is not the runner en route which decides whether play continues or not. It is the question of whether or not the pitcher threw wild to a base on his pick-off attempt.

When the pitcher faked to first, he did not complete the throw. Since he did not complete the throw, he was no longer attempting to pick-off a runner. Now he is a fielder, just like all the rest. At that moment, the umpire should call, "Time," and enforce the balk penalty.

It does not matter if runners are en route or not.

The fact that the pitcher subsequently threw the ball into center field is meaningless. He was no longer a pitcher, and he was no longer attempting a pick-off.
__________________
Jim Porter
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old Thu Mar 01, 2001, 08:56am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Posts: 813
Carl Childres (quoted):
But a continuous event ends the instant a second event occurs.

Kill the ball, enforce the balk. Jim Evans, Jim Porter, and Carl Childress all agree.

__________________________________________________ ___

And what exactly do you say to the runner, who started the play by running to 2nd base and has yet to stop (unless he got there before F1 threw ball into centerfield)? He thinks he is still running since his legs are still moving. He hasn't stopped since he started. He thinks he has made a continuous effort toward 2nd as he sees that ball flying toward centerfield. He thinks he wants to continue(ous) toward 3rd base. He's already gotten what he would have received in award from the balk, but he wants more. Why do you impose yourself midstream into this on-going play?
__________________________________________________ _______

NAPBL 6.7 (quoted):

"... The ball becomes dead when the umpire calls "Time" following the call of balk, and the call of "Time" is to be made only when play stops." (my emphasis)
__________________________________________________ _________

I see the runner as initiating the immediate playing action by attempting to advance (i.e. the offense is initiating the "continuous event", as you call it) and he has not yet started a 2nd action nor completed his first action (obtained and stopped at 2nd base). You seem to be wanting to ignore that the offense is part of this playing action. In fact, the offense initiated this immediate action. Are they no longer part of this play or game?

I am not yet willing to accept this in the manner you have stated it. Can you provide the exact wording of the JEA clause (in context) that justifies killing this play midstream?

Just my opinion,

Steve
Member
EWS




[Edited by Bfair on Mar 1st, 2001 at 07:59 AM]
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old Thu Mar 01, 2001, 09:07am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Posts: 813
Garth Benham (quoted):
Jim Evans puts it this way:

"When a pitcher balks, one of three contingencies may occur: (1) the pitcher stops his delivery and retains possession of the ball, (2) the pitcher continues his delivery and completes his throw to a base, or (3) the pitcher continues his delivery and completes a pitch to the batter."


Does Jim Evans say anything about the offense on this play, or has he too ignored that they are part of the playing action as Childress has?

Just my opinion,

Steve Freix
Member
EWS

Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:05pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1