greatest interference play i ever heard

[Dakota]

Originally Posted by rwest

...And I don't believe you are correct about who will bat next inning. There is no justification for a fourth out here. The third out ended the inning. That was the interference. The batter-runner's at bat never ended because she was never put out.

The at-bat is completed because the batter became a BR. Doesn't matter what happens after that on the play, she is not batting again. She put the ball in play, and that play resulted in the 3rd out. Her at bat is done.

Originally Posted by rwest

...and then only when it applies to a runner who scored.

That quirky ruling only applies to ASA.

[rwest]

Originally Posted by Dakota

The at-bat is completed because the batter became a BR. Doesn't matter what happens after that on the play, she is not batting again. She put the ball in play, and that play resulted in the 3rd out. Her at bat is done.That quirky ruling only applies to ASA.

I'm sold on her at bat ending, but not on the negating of the run with 2 outs. The third out of the inning was not the BR being put out before reaching 1st.

[Dakota]

BTW, which rule set are we discussing here? Any? All? Some? One?

[rwest]

Originally Posted by Dakota

BTW, which rule set are we discussing here? Any? All? Some? One?

I don't believe the OP stated which rule set.